Re: 290 test 4 hours??
- From: catwalker63 <_catwalker63_@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:06:38 -0500
PAJ <MBLOSSOMpaj-news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> prattled ceaselessly in
news:k0uhi31a7c5i7m38h2iv0mlp0et80nrgsc@xxxxxxx:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 12:19:04 -0500, catwalker63
<_catwalker63_@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
PAJ <MBLOSSOMpaj-news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> prattled ceaselessly in
news:ccbgi3pnr9deloqtkgf20bj1t5td7rs86v@xxxxxxx:
I replied. Does that make me the stinky troll?
Is the bait stinky?
I dunno about the troll part, but the aftershave . . . . <eg>
r u flirtin with me? Do I really smell that good?
Now don't you worry about upsetting others. They can deal with it.
I'm just afraid if someone lights a match or gets a call on their cell
you're gonna go up like a roman candle.
--
Catwalker
MCNGP #43
www.mcngp.com
"Definitely not wearing any underwear."
.
- References:
- 290 test 4 hours??
- From: Phil Hedrick
- Re: 290 test 4 hours??
- From: PAJ
- Re: 290 test 4 hours??
- From: catwalker63
- Re: 290 test 4 hours??
- From: PAJ
- Re: 290 test 4 hours??
- From: catwalker63
- Re: 290 test 4 hours??
- From: PAJ
- 290 test 4 hours??
- Prev by Date: Re: 290 test 4 hours??
- Previous by thread: Re: 290 test 4 hours??
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|