Re: XP or 2000
anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com
Date: 07/29/04
- Next message: JaR: "Re: XP or 2000"
- Previous message: TechGeekPro: "Re: My Live Cam Shows"
- In reply to: TechGeekPro: "Re: XP or 2000"
- Next in thread: JaR: "Re: XP or 2000"
- Reply: JaR: "Re: XP or 2000"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:26:53 -0700
Folks,
I feel comforatble with both, but I've been supporting
2000 for a couple years now and feel very confident in
that area. I dont think preparing for XP would be all
that tough or different. I guess the best way to phrase
my question would be...Am I wasting my time with 2000
because its not the most up to date and-WILL IT NOT be
offered soon as an exam?
>-----Original Message-----
>On Jul 28, 2004 "TechGeekPro" blathered:
>
>> On Jul 28, 2004 "JaR" blathered:
>>
>>> Why would you consider getting a certification in
something that you are
>>> not proficient at doing.
>>
>> To work toward becoming proficient at it.
>
>To put it better:
>
>"Passing certifications is not a race, it's truely the
road to it that
>counts...".*
>
>* Quoted from Johan Hiemstra, the Webmaster of
TechExams.net.
>
>--
>Tech "Philosophical Geek" Pro
>MCNGP #36, MCSA, A+, Net+, i-Net+
>I'm TechGeekPro, and I approved this post.
>.
>
- Next message: JaR: "Re: XP or 2000"
- Previous message: TechGeekPro: "Re: My Live Cam Shows"
- In reply to: TechGeekPro: "Re: XP or 2000"
- Next in thread: JaR: "Re: XP or 2000"
- Reply: JaR: "Re: XP or 2000"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|