Re: 2000 or 2003? Which should I pursue?

From: Colin Nash [MVP] (cnash-REMOVETHIS-_at_mvps.org)
Date: 02/17/04


Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 20:09:07 -0500

I wonder if a hiring manager would really say "Sorry, we run 2000 here.
Your 2003 cert is meaningless. Goodbye!"

I can see it with NT vs 2000 but 2000 vs 2003????

"Paul" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:117f201c3f4ed$e8bcf530$a601280a@phx.gbl...
> If I were you, I would get the MCSE 2000 first and then
> upgrade to W2k3 with the 2 upgrade tests. That way, you
> will have 2 MCSE's with only 9 tests.
> >-----Original Message-----
> >Which MCSA track should I pursue: 2000 or 2003? I've
> got
> >about five years (solid) experience running small (less
> >than 200 users) Windows NT 4.0 and 2000 Server networks,
> >plus an outdated MCP in Windows NT 4.0 Server. I
> >currently run a 150 node Windows 2000 domain with no
> >plans to upgrade to 2003 until early next year (blame it
> >on the enterprise / exchange folks!)
> >
> >Since my day-to-day taks are with Windows 2000, should I
> >take the easy route and stick with Windows 2000
> >certification exams, or setup a Windows 2003 lab just
> for
> >practise?
> >
> >Dan Adams
> >
> >
> >.
> >