Re: Drive setup
Date: 02/12/04

Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 12:35:06 -0800

By default i know windows 2003 makes basic disks on
install (you cant make a dynamic on install). But you can
convert the basic disk holding the boot/system to a
volume (dynamic) after the install. Dynamic disks just
cant be read by anything other then xp/2000/2003

>-----Original Message-----
>Yes, it is a hareware RAID created with the RAID
>controller. Thanks for all the help. After I posted
>question I remembered that you couldn't or shouldn't
>install Windows on a dynamic disk which is what you
>have to have in order to create a RAID volume. You
>were/are right in that Windows sees the hardware array
>one large drive, less the space of one disk which I
>is for parity.
>That brings me to another question. Is it that you
>shouldn't or can't at all install Windows on a dynamic
>disk? Meaning, the OS has to be installed on a basic
>disk right?
>>-----Original Message-----
>>He said he was using a RAID controller...thats hardware
>to me.
>><> wrote in message
>>> He didnt mention if he was going to use hardware or
>>> software raid.
>>> >-----Original Message-----
>>> >Since its a hardware array windows will boot fine in
>>> RAID5, it just sees
>>> >the array as disk0. You may be thinking of the
>>> RAID thats part of
>>> >the OS. The most common way to set up a server is to
>>> have 2 drives mirrored
>>> >as the boot drives for redundancy and the remainder
>>> up in RAID5. Since
>>> >he only has 4 drives in this case he should just use
>>> RAID5 for all the
>>> >disks, It doesn't hurt to have fault tolerance for
>>> OS.
>>> >
>>> >"Dan" <> wrote in
>>> message
>>> >news:eace01c3f18c$c3627170$a101280a@phx.gbl...
>>> >> Unless I'm mistaken (and I'm sure someone will
>>> if
>>> >> I am), it isn't possible to install or start
>>> >> Server on a RAID-5 volume. Therefore, if you
>>> >> Windows on one of your SCSI drives and then
>>> all
>>> >> four to a RAID-5 volume, you'd lose the ability to
>>> >> the OS, thus losing access to the volume anyway.
>>> >>
>>> >> Unless you're using hardware RAID, the only way to
>>> >> provide fault-tolerance to the system is to use a
>>> >> mirrored drive set-up. Obviously this means using
>>> >> separate drive. As you only have four, you'd
>>> >> create a partition/volume for the mirror on one of
>>> these
>>> >> and then use the remaining space to act as one
>>> >> the RAID volume. This would, unfortunately, limit
>>> >> space available to the RAID volume on the other two
>>> >> drives as RAID requires all volumes contained in
>>> be
>>> >> of an equal size.
>>> >>
>>> >> If anyone can clarify this information for both
>>> >> and "annonymous", that would be helpful.
>>> >>
>>> >> >-----Original Message-----
>>> >> >I have a new server that I am setting up on the
>>> >> network.
>>> >> >It has 4 removable SCSI drives in it and I
>>> >> >wanted to setup one volume from a single hard
>>> >> using
>>> >> >the RAID controller and install Windows on this
>>> volume.
>>> >> >I then wanted to create a RAID5 volume out of the
>>> >> >remaining three drives for data/storage. My
>>> >> >that always thinks he has the best idea insists on
>>> >> >creating one RAID5 volume out of the 4 drives.
>>> or
>>> >> >does this seem to be the best way to go? I told
>>> >> that
>>> >> >it would be easiet to rebuild the system and not
>>> >> >data on the data volume in the event something
>>> happened
>>> >> >to any of the system files. Maybe he is right
>>> time.
>>> >> >.
>>> >> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >.
>>> >