Re: Biztalk Solution
- From: "Yossi Dahan" <yossi.dahan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 13:52:15 +0100
I'd say it does really comes down to who as better access to the data that
drives the decision. but other considerations such as how easy it will be to
view and modify this configuration.
In BizTalk you may find the rules engine be very useful for this, and will
automatically provide you caching abilities, versioning etc.
Another option is to have a consuming pipeline component in the receive
pipeline to consume any messages that should not be processed (and driven by
db access or something), this is all custom code, but will reduce the load
on the BizTalk server (other then the receiving host) as messages that
should not be processed will not get persisted into the message box and no
instance of an orchestration is required)
you may be able to combine the two and call the rules engine from a the
pipeline component
Yossi Dahan
"pfeifest" <pfeifest@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1121462823.020488.29300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Hello-
>
> We are setting up a Biztalk Enterprise Solution and we are trying to
> determine how 214 transactions will be handled.
>
> Scenario: Our AS400 generates 214 transactions for all customers.
> However, only certain customers subscribe to certain transactions.
>
> Question: Should we filter out those 214's BEFORE they get to Biztalk
> or should be let Biztalk determine whether these transactions need to
> be sent or not (though Orchestration and partner codes).
>
> Thanks for any input-
>
> pfeifest
>
.
- References:
- Biztalk Solution
- From: pfeifest
- Biztalk Solution
- Prev by Date: Re: Biztalk Solution
- Next by Date: Re: Biztalk 2004 - ftp adapter watching for multiple file masks
- Previous by thread: Re: Biztalk Solution
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading