Re: Rule No fire
- From: "Matt Milner" <matt.milner@m3technologypartners dot com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 22:15:33 -0500
you either need to pass in a dataconnection as a fact, or create a fact
retriever that asserts a dataconnection and set this fact retriever on the
policy properties.
Matt
"Sam" <Sam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4CE65695-090D-4ED2-86D4-FD6383597A71@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>I am wondering if you have found the right solution to your problem. I am
> undergoing the same issue now. My rule does not get fired whenever I use
> Sql
> Table Column as a fact. It works fine with just XML Schemas but not
> database
> table columns.
>
> I cannot get access of the article
> ms-help://BTS_2004/SDK/htm/ebiz_prog_rules_gjsb.htm as well.
>
> Can you pls. help?
>
> Thanks,
> S
>
> "spam" wrote:
>
>> Thanks for your help
>>
>> And now to the new question, how do I send the connection string to the
>> rules engine?
>>
>> I tried several routes but still no luck.
>>
>> I have a test harness that produces similar results.
>>
>>
>> kind regard
>>
>> User
>>
>> "Nabeel Prior" <nowhere@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:OYKZX7k1EHA.3468@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > Testing the policy is only the same as running it through an
>> > orchestration
>> > if the fact sources can be set in both ways. In other words, if you
>> > need
>> > to supply a schema in your rules, you also need to supply a schema in
>> > your
>> > orchestration. In terms of the SQL, the same applies - if you need to
>> > supply a SQL connection when testing you also need to make sure you
>> > supply
>> > a SQL connection from your orchestration.
>> >
>> > This article may help you, although it focuses more on how to update
>> > SQL
>> > from the rules engine:
>> > ms-help://BTS_2004/SDK/htm/ebiz_prog_rules_gjsb.htm
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > Kind Regards,
>> >
>> > Nabeel Prior
>> > Web: http://www.brainjar.co.za
>> > Blog: http://www.brainjar.co.za/blog.aspx
>> >
>> >
>> > "user" <nob1230@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> > news:Cdlqd.1247$Pi3.565@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >>I can test the rule successfully therefore can I assume that all is OK?
>> >>
>> >> I can select the message as a parameter in the orchstration.
>> >>
>> >> I have a similar poicy that works, the difference between the two is
>> >> that
>> >> the one that does not work is compering information to values stored
>> >> in a
>> >> database rather then constants (works).
>> >>
>> >> the only problem is that it will not fire and I cannot find any errors
>> >> anywhere?
>> >>
>> >> Any help would be apprciated.
>> >>
>> >> User
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> "Nabeel Prior" <nowhere@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> >> news:un6jVBF1EHA.2876@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >>> You need to make sure that the document type in your rules matches
>> >>> the
>> >>> .Net document type of your schema that the rules will execute on.
>> >>> You
>> >>> will know if this has been done correctly if in your Call Rules shape
>> >>> you are able to select your message as a parameter for the policy you
>> >>> are calling.
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>>
>> >>> Kind Regards,
>> >>>
>> >>> Nabeel Prior
>> >>> Web: http://www.brainjar.co.za
>> >>> Blog: http://www.brainjar.co.za/blog.aspx
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> "user" <nob1230@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> >>> news:z1gpd.490$Az5.175@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >>>>I have an orchestration that calls a policy that includes two rules,
>> >>>>when the orchestration is executed, the polict is loaded but no rule
>> >>>>is
>> >>>>fired (HAT conforms that).
>> >>>> no errors are recorded anywhere.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Can you help?
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
.
- References:
- Re: Rule No fire
- From: Sam
- Re: Rule No fire
- Prev by Date: Question on Header in flat file
- Next by Date: RE: BizTalk server Topology & scalibilty
- Previous by thread: Re: Rule No fire
- Next by thread: Service Pack 1, software req.
- Index(es):
Loading