Do you use a standard when creating your own or intermediary schem
- From: isabelledc <isabelledc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 07:02:04 -0700
I would like to know if any of you use a standard for defining your own
schemas or
intermediary schemas..or do you just start from scratch and define
everything yourself.
And if you do , what standard do you use.
We used to use the OAGIS-standard and used it everywhere as an intermediary
schema (when starting with biztalk we were 'suggested' to do so by our
consultants ) ,even for messages that were from internal system 1 to
internal system 2 and were very specific , so not very likekely to come/go
to somewhere-else.
When moving from biztalk 2002 to 2006 I did a lot of the maps again and
threw out the OAGIS-schema in between, that almost halved my number of maps
and made it a lot easier to follow what happened.
I'm still using oagis-in betweens for stuff that really can come or go
different ways(mostly external) f.e despatch advices or purchase or
sales-orders...
So I think it's usefull but not all the time and everywhere.
What's your opinion on this.
Are there other/better business standards that you use ? (other than OAGIS)
I find that a document that is created using the OAGIS-standard gets rather
big ,lots of levels before you get to the data = huge file with little data
in it.
And we used a lot of the UserArea's because in many cases we couldn't really
find a good spot in the standard nodes.
Thanks for your thoughts on this.
Isabelle
.
- Prev by Date: This Assembler cannot retrieve a document specification using this
- Next by Date: Biztalk 2006 R2 FTP Adapter
- Previous by thread: This Assembler cannot retrieve a document specification using this
- Next by thread: Biztalk 2006 R2 FTP Adapter
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
