Re: Mapping problem after orchestration in BizTalk Server

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance

Hi Randal,

Unfortunately this is not the case. I checked this and this is ok. I already
validated the document in Visual Studio both in with Schema and Mapping
validation, they both process fine.


Regards
Remon


"Randal van Splunteren" wrote:

Hi Remon,

Looks like the BizTalk message type is not known at the time the message
leaves the orchestration and goes to the map of the send port. The map needs
to know the message type (namespace#rootnode) in order to execute. Maybe
your orchestrations removes the context of the message. This can be the case
when you for example copy the (message1 = message2) in a message construct
shape.
Examine the message context when the message leaves the orchestration. See
if the context contains the message type.

HTH,

Randal van Splunteren

"Remon Bekker" <RemonBekker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:27068A79-773B-40D4-8AFA-9592CCF775D4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi all,

I've setup a receive location which sends a document towards an
orchestration. The orchestration does some work on the document and sends
it
through to a sendport. This sendport contains a mapping, but somehow it's
not
executed.

I know the mapping works, because another receiveport send a document
direct
to the sendport which processes the mapping correctly. I also compared the
document output from the orchestration with the other document and they
are
technically the same.

Does anyone know why the mapping is not executed when the document is
received from the orchestration?


Regards,
Remon


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Dynamic mapping inside orchestration
    ... mapping inside my orchestration based on the received location. ... Get the service to return the fully qualified name for that map. ... Have the orchestration extract the receive location info from the ... Make an output message of type System.Xml.XmlDocument (msgOutput) ...
    (microsoft.public.biztalk.general)
  • Re: rules engine
    ... Private email: j...@xxxxxxxxxx ... all of it because depending on the partner, ... each dest where rules could kind of live in a per orchestration ... The mapping avoidance is more a political thing then anything else, ...
    (microsoft.public.biztalk.general)
  • Re: Mapping problem after orchestration in BizTalk Server
    ... Which Biztalk version are you using BTS2k6R2, ... validated the document in Visual Studio both in with Schema and Mapping ... Examine the message context when the message leaves the orchestration. ... This sendport contains a mapping, ...
    (microsoft.public.biztalk.general)
  • Re: Mapping problem after orchestration in BizTalk Server
    ... Looks like the BizTalk message type is not known at the time the message leaves the orchestration and goes to the map of the send port. ... I know the mapping works, because another receiveport send a document direct ...
    (microsoft.public.biztalk.general)
  • Re: fUnit finally released
    ... verifying that the tangent-linear and adjoint forms are consistent ... a routine to multiply an N-vector by the Jacobian of said mapping; ... need validation but are still self-contained within the system ... (e.g. pure math, even if nontrivial math). ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)