Re: Deployment Problem

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance

How did you create this orchestration? Did you copy it from another? In this
case make sure:
* all artifact types (port types, multi-part message types) are renamed;
* all Send/Receive port shapes are renamed.

--
Regards,

Leonid Ganeline [BizTalk MVP]
http://geekswithblogs.net/leonidganeline/


"Saravanan" <Saravanan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:E4887AE2-FCB7-4371-A48F-641FA07E06DF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hey man, thanks for your reply. I found the solution here,

http://geekswithblogs.net/nsthompson/archive/2006/10/12/BindingFailureBlocksOrchestrationDeployment.aspx

Really crazy !!!. I dont understand why is this behaviour?


Thanks,
Saravanan

"iBizTalk" wrote:

If you create a test port in the admin console do you see this problem?
If
not, try removing any early bindings in your orchestration and create the
ports in the admin console.

If you have a problem creating a port in the admin console, you likely
have
a problem with one of your user accounts.

I cant explain the behavior you are reporting here, but I would suggest
eliminating any variables which would cause it.

Hope this helps

http://www.magazine.onlinetransmissions.com

"Saravanan" <Saravanan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:CFFB91E8-6B57-4B26-9CC3-6781A184A5CD@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hey Thanks for your reply.

On looking at the error i also thought the same thing whatever you have
written. But, contrary to our thinking, I am deploying it for the first
time
from my VS and the deployment is on my local machine only.

Thanks,
Saravanan

"iBizTalk" wrote:

Sounds like you are deploying on a seperate machine? You've either
got
bindings that are set to point to a trusted host instance when the
host
instance is not trusted, or the opposite.

Or, you have an adapter configured under a host instance which is
trusted/not trusted and needs to be the opposite.

If none of this helps, undeploy everything and start from the ground
up
and
see which application causes the problem.

Hope this helps

http://www.magazine.onlinetransmissions.com



"Saravanan" <Saravanan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:D750DB13-9C29-46E3-9F88-3FD726A44B84@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,

I have a solution which has around 6 biztalk projects and all are
dependent
on one or the other. Whwn i try to deploy the project, its throwing
the
following error. And i am not able to make out anything out of that
error
:(
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Error: Failed to add resource(s). Change requests failed for some
resources.
BizTalkAssemblyResourceManager failed to complete end type change
request.
Failed to update binding information. The following items could not
be
matched up to hosts due to name and/or trust level mismatches:
Item: '<Orchestration Name>' Host: 'BizTalkServerApplication' Trust
level:
'Untrusted'
You must do one of the following:
1) Create hosts with these names and trust levels and try again
2) Re-export the MSI without the binding files and have a post
import
script
apply a suitable binding file.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the above error point 1) is the default of biztalk server. Point
2)
i
dont need to worry as i am deploying from Visual Studio.

Please help!!!


Thanks,
Saravanan




.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Deployment Problem
    ... "iBizTalk" wrote: ... bindings that are set to point to a trusted host instance when the host ... trusted/not trusted and needs to be the opposite. ... Failed to update binding information. ...
    (microsoft.public.biztalk.general)
  • Re: Deployment Problem
    ... try removing any early bindings in your orchestration and create the ports in the admin console. ... If you have a problem creating a port in the admin console, you likely have a problem with one of your user accounts. ... bindings that are set to point to a trusted host instance when the host ... > Failed to update binding information. ...
    (microsoft.public.biztalk.general)
  • Re: External drives not installing or working properly on USB
    ... with the USB system before but these disappearred when I disabled the ... Only one of the five host controllers is connected to the 6 ... work on any port on the PC? ... operating system to recognise the four additional 'drives'. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: A firewall wont stop this one
    ... On top of that I implement IPF on each host ... >> for further access control to limit NFS, ... By restricting access to the NFS server. ... >> via port filtering that only allowed specific hosts rather than all. ...
    (alt.computer.security)
  • Re: /etc/hosts.equiv & .rhosts
    ... want to login at another host, that host needs the first host's name ... best to allow key-only login so hackers can't ... on the port 22 as it WILL be messed with all day long. ... # Protocol 2 only ...
    (comp.os.linux.security)