Using BizTalk 2006 with a remote Management Database

Hi,

We have installed BTS 2006 on two developer machines and have, of course,
simply used the SQL Server databases that exist on those machines.

Now we have an application to deploy. We have two servers, one for BTS
itself and another for the databases it uses. However, we have been unable
to succeed in setting things up in this way and have had to revert to simply
installing all the bits of BizTalk onto a single machine. This is fine for
now, but we can see that it will be a problem in the future.

Can anyone explain how we can persuade BizTalk 2006 to use management
databases located on a remote machine.

Many thanks


Peter


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Access 2: Cant Perform Join- Combined Fields Too Long
    ... I am still maintaining Access 2.0 databases, ... installation procedure on each PC'. ... machines, figuring I suppose that anyone who wanted to use Access ... point to the former Office installation which was on Drive C (which on ...
    (comp.databases.ms-access)
  • Re: Developer design Best Practices
    ... multiple smaller databases that were created adhoc on those servers for the ... SQL on these machines and than installed their application and pointed it ... production machines. ... Many of the objects in these databases are owned by not ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.server)
  • Re: Oracle RAC vs VM WARE
    ... virtual machines between the 2 new machines, with the databases ... I doubt though that 3 VMs, each with an Oracle instance running ... RAC may or may not be the right choice depending on ...
    (comp.databases.oracle.server)
  • Re: DOS, how long?
    ... There's no reason it should. ... I've always had a way with machines. ... I have done all those things in various small databases, ... Would be a foolish person that did not migrate data to new platforms ...
    (comp.programming)
  • Re: Will Access 97 .mdw work in Access 2003?
    ... > file to new machines and expect same results or will I have to design the ... > BTW am I correct in an assumption that I will have to keep all databases ... > in Access 97 format for the purpose of design changes (while data entry ... make a 2003 copy of the frontend by ...
    (microsoft.public.access.security)