RE: Need help for clustering biztalk 2006
- From: taozhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Tao Zhang[MSFT])
- Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 01:06:48 GMT
BTW, I think the biggest issue for redundance in BTS talk is to cluster
your SQL database. Because in every step the message is saves into
database. If you don't want any data lose, better cluster the SQL server
first.
Cluster Biztalk server is make sure the process(receiving, sending,
ochestration) will not stop if one machine fails.
So, to protect against database lose: cluster SQL server
to protect process disruption: cluster Biztalk server.
Yes, if you just want to cluster your send process, you just need to
cluster 2 machines that handle send port.
--------------------
19:06:46 GMT)From: "ashp" <jjcpa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.biztalk.general
Subject: Need help for clustering biztalk 2006
Date: 1 Dec 2006 11:06:40 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <1165000000.790772.172020@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.139.228.193
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1165000006 23189 127.0.0.1 (1 Dec 2006
NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@xxxxxxxxxx
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 19:06:46 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1;
posting-host=209.139.228.193;Complaints-To: groups-abuse@xxxxxxxxxx
Injection-Info: n67g2000cwd.googlegroups.com;
TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTFEEDS02.phx.gbl!tornado.fposting-account=kjtOwA0AAADirZbbwVL1DNdSRr80dSj1
Path:
astwebnet.it!tiscali!newsfeed1.ip.tiscali.net!proxad.net!216.239.36.134.MISM
ATCH!postnews.google.com!n67g2000cwd.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Xref: TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl microsoft.public.biztalk.general:207
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.biztalk.general
Hi, we are going to migrate BTS2004 to 2006 and want to implement
clustering for them. We have 6 biztalk servers and 3 SQL servers. Of
the 6 BTS servers, 2 for receiving, 2 for processing and 2 for sending.
All 6 BTS servers are in the same group. My questions are
1. If we only want to cluster in-process send host on 2 of 6 servers,
do we need to cluster all 6 servers or only cluster 2 of them?
2. How big is the shared disk array?
BTW, I could not see the big benefit of clustering. We have enough
redundancy - we have 2 boxes for each pier to cover it.
thanks,
JJCPA
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Connected Systems Division Team
Get Connected!
Meet and interact with key BizTalk Server program managers, developers, and
testers, and let them and other BizTalk Server community team members and
Most Valuable Professionals help you solve your product questions.
Navigate to http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscriptions/support/ in your
webrowser and register as a managed customer to receive MSDN Managed
Newsgroup Support!
MSDN managed newsgroups are available in English to MSDN Universal,
Enterprise, Professional, and Operating Systems subscribers to receive
free, unlimited technical support on select Microsoft technologies as well
as to share ideas with other subscribers.
.
- Prev by Date: RE: FTP Server Compatibility
- Next by Date: RE: NullReferenceException in Biztalk 2004 with SP1
- Previous by thread: RE: FTP Server Compatibility
- Next by thread: RE: NullReferenceException in Biztalk 2004 with SP1
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
