BizTalk Terminology: "Messaging Service Instance" or "Port Instance". Give us explanation
- From: "Leonid Ganeline" <leo_gan_57@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 16:21:37 -0700
Hi,
IMHO
There should be the term "Port Instance" or something else.
In HAT we can see Service Instances in two main classes: Orchestration and
Messaging.
The first one is quite understandable.
But the second one is not described in BTS Help.
As I can imagine it is the part of the port which created in "per-message"
basis like Orchestration.
Now "Messaging" is the term for it. But Messaging could be attached to
anything in BizTalk, it is too wide term.
But I don't mind any term. Now we DON'T have ANY term.
Nowhere in Help we could find description of this "Instance part of Port",
we could only guess.
Now this term is used on "BizTalk developer team" level.
If it is not possible to hide it from BizTalk Users then BizTalk Users have
to got this term, got to description of what's going on inside BizTalk with
it.
PS
I don't like term the "Port Instance" but it is not the point.
--
Regards,
Leonid Ganeline
BizTalk Solution Developer
===================================
BizTalk Blog -- http://geekswithblogs.net/leonidganeline
.
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: BizTalk Terminology: "Messaging Service Instance" or "Port Instance". Give us explanation
- From: Sumitra Sujanani [MSFT]
- RE: BizTalk Terminology: "Messaging Service Instance" or "Port Instance". Give us explanation
- Prev by Date: SQL adapter using Delete SPROC
- Next by Date: Re: Exposing a Business Rule as a Web Service
- Previous by thread: SQL adapter using Delete SPROC
- Next by thread: RE: BizTalk Terminology: "Messaging Service Instance" or "Port Instance". Give us explanation
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
