RE: MSMQ Adapter Send Port [The time-to-reach-queue has elapsed]
- From: dogirard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Doug Girard [MSFT])
- Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 21:43:39 GMT
I'm not intimately familiar with MSMQ myself, but I do know that there are
several different types of message expiration events. One in particular to
be aware of is messages being consumed off of the destination queue. I
believe it's possible for messages to be successfully delivered from
BizTalk to the destination MSMQ queue and later come back to the sender's
dead letter queue because they were never destructively read off of the
destination queue by any application before a TTL was hit. I recall seeing
this behavior before until we turned on an application to removed messages
from the remote queue. Just something else to think about.
HTH,
Doug Girard [MSFT]
Note: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
--------------------
Reply-To: "Craig Neuwirt" <cneuwirt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Craig Neuwirt" <cneuwirt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: MSMQ Adapter Send Port [The time-to-reach-queue has elapsed]
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 09:22:30 -0500
Lines: 15
Organization: EMSI
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
Message-ID: <#jF9yWzdFHA.3012@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.biztalk.general
NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.170.227.50
Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl
Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.biztalk.general:14909
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.biztalk.general
Whenever I invoke an orchestration for the first time that sends a
non-transactional response message over MSMQ Adapter to a remote queue, I
get a negative acknowledgement in the BizTalk which results in a message in
the Dead-letter messages queue with the following reason:
The time-to-reach-queue has elapsed.
All following messages (after orch was initialized) work fine. I don't
understand how this error can occur since the remote queue is definitely
available. Is there a timeout that may be occuring some where?
thanks,
craig
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Questions for Sangram Mohapatra
- Next by Date: RE: Oracle Adapter
- Previous by thread: How do I determine BTS 2004 SP1
- Next by thread: RE: Oracle Adapter
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|