Re: Question for BizTYalk Developers: Filters in ports:
- From: "Tomas Restrepo \(MVP\)" <tomasr@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:30:25 -0500
Leonid,
* Why they are so different?
The filters for Send Ports(SP) and Send Port Groups (SPG) located
"inside"
them. The filters for Receive Ports are located inside Receive shapes in
orchestrations.
That means I can change the subscription for SPs and SPGs with helping of
the binding file in the production environment but can not change there
the
"orchestration subscription".
Is it for a purpose?
Filters could not be defined in receive ports/locations themselves. After
all, they are the ones that *receive* the message, so how could (or why
would) they subscribe to it?
The filter is defined in the *orchestration* because it is the orchestration
that subscribed to the message, not the port. Now, I imagine your question
is rather why the filter is not defined in the *Logical* Receive port in the
orchestration, but that is because a single receive port can be tied to
multiple receive shapes in an orchestration (only one of which is usually an
activating receive). If it was the logical port that had the filter, this
wouldn't work.
--
Tomas Restrepo
tomasr@xxxxxxxx
http://www.winterdom.com/
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Custom send pipeline
- Next by Date: BIZTALK 2004/ CONTRACT/ MA
- Previous by thread: Re: Custom send pipeline
- Next by thread: Re: Question for BizTYalk Developers: Filters in ports:
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
