Re: Versioning XML Schemas
- From: "Leo Gan" <leo_gan_57@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 08:16:03 -0800
I think, using versions in the namespaces has the same advantage as it has
in the assembly names. For example, if we have or want or "have to live
with" different schemas in the production environment we'd rather use the
versions in the namespaces. When we work under one version (assembly or
schema) in development usually we don't need versioning.
--
Regards,
Leonid Ganeline,
BizTalk Developer, MCSD,
Vancouver,
http://geekswithblogs.net/leonidganeline/
"Leo Gan" <leo_gan_57@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ucGpYKlEGHA.3612@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Tatiana,
> Never seen the verions in the namespaces.
> Is there any advantage in it? Seems it would be useful for "long-live"
> schemas, doesn't it?
>
> --
>
> Regards,
>
> Leonid Ganeline,
> BizTalk Developer, MCSD,
> Vancouver,
> http://geekswithblogs.net/leonidganeline/
> "Tatyana Yakushev [MSFT]" <tatyanam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:b2JTXNkEGHA.1236@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> I've seen many schemas and most of the people put version in the target
>> namespace.
>> I don't see any management overhead in this approach.
>>
>
>
.
- References:
- RE: Versioning XML Schemas
- From: Tatyana Yakushev [MSFT]
- Re: Versioning XML Schemas
- From: Leo Gan
- RE: Versioning XML Schemas
- Prev by Date: How to specify Test Flag in X12 messages? (Base EDI adapter)
- Next by Date: RE: Retrieving information from BAM
- Previous by thread: Re: Versioning XML Schemas
- Next by thread: RE: Import Schema Error
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|