Re: Is anyone actually using HWS ?
- From: "Valery Pryamikov" <valery@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 20:07:15 +0200
However, there is one good reason to use HWS ... it is when you need to proove your manager that you need a better monitor ;-).
-Valery. http://www.harper.no/valery
"Jules" <Roseanna80@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1125578331.709803.163190@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I have been trying to understand HWS, and how it helps orchestrate human workflows. But it seems like a lot of complexuity to achieve very little.
I watched a 1 hour HWS Tutorial webcast, and wound up the basic Action orchestration, which had fifty or so items in the toolbox, as a starting basis! - it seems that it is up to the client to actually orchestrate to workflow and that HWS is just a complex enabling API.
I was sort of expecting simple graphical workflow editors, that my end customers could manipulate and maintain. HWS seems a long way off this aspration.
Any views/suggestions. I guess I go and look for an Open Source solution.
Jules
.
- References:
- Is anyone actually using HWS ?
- From: Jules
- Is anyone actually using HWS ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Is anyone actually using HWS ?
- Next by Date: Re: FTP from BT won't "quit" after successful xfer
- Previous by thread: Re: Is anyone actually using HWS ?
- Next by thread: MS SQL Adapter Question (BT02 and BT04)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
