Re: Getting database value into a rule policy
- From: "solid" <solid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 06:41:06 -0700
Ok, that makes sense. The only parameter that I can send to the call rules
is the multi-part message type. I don't see where I can send a database
connection instance (meaning it doesnt appear in the drop down parameter
list).
Thank you for your help.
David
"Leo Gan" wrote:
> Yes,
> You have to set up the Parameters of Rule shape (they are like "instances"
> of the fact objects)
>
> --
> Leonid Ganeline,
> BizTalk Developer
> http://public.fotki.com/leogan/
>
> "solid" <solid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:EF566FFC-C0B5-48D8-A911-D8B078EE6C89@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > For the sake of learning Biztalk, I'm running through a number of test
> > scenarios.
> >
> > My working orchestration retrieves an infopath form from a sharepoint form
> > library and changes a value in the form and then puts the form back in the
> > sharepoint form library. No problems here.
> >
> > What I would like to get working is for the value that is changed to come
> > from a database table. In my testing I have a table with a field called
> > "age" and the value in row 1 is 111. I want to get that value in a rules
> > policy and set the xml field (also called age) to 111.
> >
> > Long story short, I added a database fact in the vocabulary to get the
> > value
> > from the database, but my policy only works in testing. When the
> > orchestration calls the policy nothing is changed.
> >
> > One thing I've noticed is that when I test the policy I have to add a
> > database instance as well as the xml instance. Is there something else I
> > need to add when calling the policy from the orchestration besides just
> > sending the message?
> >
> > solid
>
>
>
.
- References:
- Getting database value into a rule policy
- From: solid
- Re: Getting database value into a rule policy
- From: Leo Gan
- Getting database value into a rule policy
- Prev by Date: Re: Send Port subscribing to another sendport
- Next by Date: Re: Send Port subscribing to another sendport
- Previous by thread: Re: Getting database value into a rule policy
- Next by thread: Multiple positions in CA and AZ for Biztalk experts
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|