RE: different message types handled by the same orchestration ?

From: v-wzhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ("WenJun Zhang[msft]")
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:43:46 GMT

Hi Ravi,

Looks like you've got the approach. However I still didn't catch the
full scenario. For a general issue, what about B doesn't respond to
the 101 too?

Anyway I think a most solid and simplest solution may be that B
responds something else like 111 to 101. Then you needn't run into
such kind of convoy design. Is this possible?

Thanks.

Best regards,

WenJun Zhang
Microsoft Online Partner Support

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.

.

Follow-Ups:
- RE: different message types handled by the same orchestration ?
  - From: Ravi Shankar

References:
- different message types handled by the same orchestration ?
  - From: Ravi Shankar
- RE: different message types handled by the same orchestration ?
  - From: Stephen W. Thomas
- RE: different message types handled by the same orchestration ?
  - From: Ravi Shankar
- RE: different message types handled by the same orchestration ?
  - From: "WenJun Zhang[msft]"
- RE: different message types handled by the same orchestration ?
  - From: Ravi Shankar

Prev by Date: RE: Mapping and connection to DB
Next by Date: SQL Adapter
Previous by thread: RE: different message types handled by the same orchestration ?
Next by thread: RE: different message types handled by the same orchestration ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: Adding members of an NT Domain to an ADS Group
... > This posting is provided "as is" with no warranties and confers no rights ... Prev by Date: ...
(microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory)
Re: SQL Server 2005 Express Install Problem - Instance Clash
... This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. ... Prev by Date: ...
(microsoft.public.sqlserver.setup)
RE: Log Reader Error
... This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. ... Prev by Date: ...
(microsoft.public.sqlserver.replication)
Re: Migrating some domain controllers from 2000 to 2003...
... This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. ... Prev by Date: ...
(microsoft.public.windows.server.migration)
Re: Capturing mouse, key events
... This posting is provided "as is" with no warranties and confers no rights. ... Prev by Date: ...
(microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.windowsforms)