SQL send port per updategram in an orchestration?
From: Xerox (Xerox_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 11/08/04
- Next message: Zdenko: "Exposing remote callable function to SAP"
- Previous message: Kai Hildebrandt: "Table Looping Functoid ==> error btm1023: System.OutOfMemoryExcept"
- Next in thread: Martijn Hoogendoorn: "Re: SQL send port per updategram in an orchestration?"
- Reply: Martijn Hoogendoorn: "Re: SQL send port per updategram in an orchestration?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 02:06:08 -0800
Looking at the way SQL send ports are configured (the fact that they need a
target schema definition specified) it looks like that one of these send
ports is required for every updategram/service used within an orchestration
that uses a different schema.
Is that correct? Can the same SQL send port be used for different updategram
schemas?
- Next message: Zdenko: "Exposing remote callable function to SAP"
- Previous message: Kai Hildebrandt: "Table Looping Functoid ==> error btm1023: System.OutOfMemoryExcept"
- Next in thread: Martijn Hoogendoorn: "Re: SQL send port per updategram in an orchestration?"
- Reply: Martijn Hoogendoorn: "Re: SQL send port per updategram in an orchestration?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|