Re: Test Map and Running map through Orchestration yields differen
From: Jeff Lynch (jeff.lynch_at_houston-lynch.com)
Date: 09/14/04
- Next message: peter: "Biztalk project not shown in the Visual Studio .net"
- Previous message: Neal Walters: "RE: root element missing"
- In reply to: Vincent: "Re: Test Map and Running map through Orchestration yields differen"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 15:23:06 -0500
Vincent,
Yes. The scenario you describe is called "Content Based Routing" and it's
pretty easy to setup. The SDK has a good example and my blog has a few
pointers.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/sdk/htm/ebiz_sdk_samples_fidw.asp
http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/jlynch/archive/2004/08/03/21114.aspx
-- Jeff Lynch "A BizTalk Enthusiast" http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/jlynch/ "Vincent" <Vincent@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:0AEAAE9E-FDF2-42DD-AEE1-80EE61EA5847@microsoft.com... > Thanks for your reply Jeff. > > I attempted to do what you suggested. However, I get the same results. > Also, > I'm not sure if I'm doing it correctly. I bind the send ports of the > orchestration to the Port Group I created. Is it possible to not use the > orchestration? > > Thanks! > > "Jeff Lynch" wrote: > >> I'm not sure why you are getting different results running through an >> orchestration but you could try this using a send port group containing >> two >> send ports, each with one of your maps. If your output files are correct >> in >> this scenario then the problem lies in the orchestration. >> >> -- >> Jeff Lynch >> "A BizTalk Enthusiast" >> http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/jlynch/ >> >> >> "Vincent" <Vincent@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message >> news:518553EE-425E-492C-B6B0-1A6F1891699C@microsoft.com... >> > Can someone help? As I'm stumped on why I'm having this problem: >> > >> > Here's what I have: >> > >> > Have created two maps. >> > >> > Purpose of map one is to output a new XML file with the same format and >> > field elements as original; but through a database lookup functoid and >> > value >> > extractor functoid and value mapping functoid, only outputting those >> > records >> > in the original xml in which the lookup value does not exist. >> > >> > Purpose of map two is to take the same original XML file as used in Map >> > one >> > to output records in which the lookup value does exist. >> > >> > The maps validate fine and test correctly when I specify a valid test >> > XML >> > file as the input. However when I deploy these maps and run them on the >> > Host >> > I do not get the same result. >> > >> > Results under map test: two seperate xml files; 1 contains data the >> > other >> > doesn't. (the expected and desired behavior). >> > >> > Results under maps deployed and running on Host: two seperate xml >> > files; >> > both contains data (basically duplicate files of original XML >> > document). >> > >> > Additional Information: >> > >> > *My original XML file is in a filedrop location. The two files that are >> > generated are dropped into another file drop location. >> > *The Host is on the same machine where the development is done. >> > *The orchestration is fairly simple. A receive location/port is defined >> > to >> > receive the incoming XML document. Then I use a parallel shape to send >> > the >> > document down two parallel paths. One utilizes the first map and the >> > other >> > utilizes the 2nd map to transform the XML document. Each has their own >> > send >> > port defined to drop the resulting documents into the same file drop >> > with >> > different file names (ValidFile.xml and ErrorFile.xml). >> > >> > Much appreciated and thank you in advance! >> > >> >> >>
- Next message: peter: "Biztalk project not shown in the Visual Studio .net"
- Previous message: Neal Walters: "RE: root element missing"
- In reply to: Vincent: "Re: Test Map and Running map through Orchestration yields differen"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
