Re: Are BizTalk server and WebService a good idea for the following:?
From: Julia (codewizard_at_012.net.il)
Date: 07/04/04
- Previous message: btsexpert: "RE: Possible bug, promoting properties w/o namespace prefix in instanc"
- In reply to: Julia: "Re: Are BizTalk server and WebService a good idea for the following:?"
- Next in thread: Nick Malik: "Re: Are BizTalk server and WebService a good idea for the following:?"
- Reply: Nick Malik: "Re: Are BizTalk server and WebService a good idea for the following:?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2004 11:01:08 +0200
should be "a reply to the e-mail address...."
"Julia" <codewizard@012.net.il> wrote in message
news:%23xt8s4ZYEHA.3156@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>
> "The third party does something (I'm not sure what). The client is
> informed
> "somehow"
>
>
> The third party send a reply to the e-mail message which is part of the
XML
>
> The client recieved the email message and call a webservice to validate it
> (some information must be put in the email message)
>
>
> "Nick Malik" <nickmalik@hotmail.nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:yhKFc.20946$XM6.1595@attbi_s53...
> > Not sure I understand your design, but what you sound like can be easily
> > done with Biztalk 2004 and the Web Services Wizard.
> >
> > Does this help?
> >
> > I'm not sure, in your description, how the messages flow. I'm hearing
> > this...
> > Client uses application.
> > Application calls Biztalk web service on Biztalk server, triggering an
> > orchestration.
> > Biztalk generates an outbound e-mail message to a third party containing
> > XML. (Perfectly valid... I've done this).
> > The third party does something (I'm not sure what). The client is
> informed
> > somehow.
> > The client uses the application to call another Biztalk web service.
> > BTS finds the existing orchestration, picks up where it left off, and
> > completes a process
> > (this, too, is not hard to do, depending on what happens in that
> middle
> > step).
> >
> > Yes, this should work.
> >
> > --- Nick Malik
> > Biztalk Bum
> >
> > "Julia" <codewizard@012.net.il> wrote in message
> > news:uuZF4oPYEHA.2672@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> > >
> > > Hello
> > >
> > > I am in process of designing a system and I need some help
> > >
> > > The following is the system description
> > >
> > > 1.a client can call an 'object' method (name Send) and pass several
> > > parameters
> > > 2.The 'object' process a incoming parameters,generate XML document
> > > attached it to an email message(either as an attachment or in the
> > message
> > > body)
> > > and send it to a recipient
> > >
> > > 3.When the client received a response to the email message fro the
> > recipient
> > > he can call an 'object' method to validate the response
> > >
> > >
> > > I wonder if BizTalk, and WebServices are suitable for this problem?
> > > I imagine WebSerivce as the 'object' and BizTalk as the server which
> > > generate
> > > email messages
> > >
> > >
> > > I don't know where will the WebSerivce exist,it could be either
inside
> > the
> > > organization or on the web.
> > > If it will reside in the organization intranet,will using WebServices
> > > instead of DCOM
> > > introduce low performance?
> > >
> > > thanks
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
- Previous message: btsexpert: "RE: Possible bug, promoting properties w/o namespace prefix in instanc"
- In reply to: Julia: "Re: Are BizTalk server and WebService a good idea for the following:?"
- Next in thread: Nick Malik: "Re: Are BizTalk server and WebService a good idea for the following:?"
- Reply: Nick Malik: "Re: Are BizTalk server and WebService a good idea for the following:?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|