Re: biztalk lag time
From: Brian Loesgen (bloesgen-at-m-s-n-d-o-t-c-o-m)
Date: 06/29/04
- Next message: Phil: "RE: VERY SLOW AICSQL UPDATES!"
- Previous message: Senthil: "Re: BizTalk 2004 Rule Composer - XML Schema Condition Problem"
- In reply to: masoud bayan: "Re: biztalk lag time"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 07:30:23 -0700
>From an orchestration, you can use the "delivery notification" property of
the send port to determine if a message was transmitted successfully. To do
so:
- Create a scope
- Put the send shape inside a scope
- Add an exception handler to the scope
- Create a send port
- Set the send port "delivery notification" property to "transmitted"
If transmission fails, whatever you put in the exception handler will run.
I love this pattern :) -- we use it all the time.
HTH,
Brian
Neudesic
Microsoft MVP BizTalk Server 2004
"masoud bayan" <masoud_bayan@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:%23047ULYXEHA.2544@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Adrian, Thanks for your reply.
> The reason that we chose MSMQ (or MSMQT) is guaranteed delivery through
> queues (because we use it for other scenarios as user profile updates as
> well), so do you think using other protocols and adapters like HTTP will
> guarantee message delivery even in case of any short or long term
> communication failure.
>
> "Adrian Hamza[MSFT]" <adrianhamza@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:JxV7JPWXEHA.2616@cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl...
> > MSMQ and MSMQT is an asynchrounous communication protocol. This means
that
> > the lag could be considerable. You could try other means of passing this
> > information like HTTP adapter.
> > --------------------
> > >>From: "masoud bayan" <masoud_bayan@hotmail.com>
> > >>Subject: biztalk lag time
> > >>Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:12:50 -0400
> > >>Lines: 21
> > >>Organization: Navantis Co
> > >>X-Priority: 3
> > >>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> > >>X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409
> > >>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
> > >>Message-ID: <OMICAoRXEHA.3988@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl>
> > >>Newsgroups: microsoft.public.biztalk.general
> > >>NNTP-Posting-Host: empower-systems.com 216.208.156.226
> > >>Path:
> >
>
cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!tk2msftngp13
> > phx.gbl
> > >>Xref: cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl microsoft.public.biztalk.general:16705
> > >>X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.biztalk.general
> > >>
> > >>We currently have two web applications which are working completely
> > separate
> > >>from each other, now we are going to implement a single-sign on
> > >>functionality among them in a way that when a user logins to each
> > >>application can redirect his browser to the other one without any
> > >>authentication required.
> > >>As a router for passing authentication info between two app we want to
> use
> > >>MSMQ to send this info and BizTalk MSMQT as a central point to receive
> > these
> > >>info (from MSMQ) process them and send to the other app as a BizTalk
> > >>subscriber. (It seems that we have to use MSMQ to be able to send
> messages
> > >>to BizTalk MSMQT.)
> > >>Now the main question is how much is the total lag time of MSMQ and
> > BizTalk
> > >>together to route Single Sign-On token between apps? it is very
> important
> > >>for us to have very small lag time otherwise user won't be able to log
> in
> > >>both application at approximately same time.
> > >>
> > >>Any idea or experience in this regard is welcomed.
> > >>
> > >>Thanks
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
> rights.
> >
> > EBusiness Server Team
> >
>
>
- Next message: Phil: "RE: VERY SLOW AICSQL UPDATES!"
- Previous message: Senthil: "Re: BizTalk 2004 Rule Composer - XML Schema Condition Problem"
- In reply to: masoud bayan: "Re: biztalk lag time"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
