SCSI or SATA

Hi,
I am looking at replacing the SBS 2000 Server with SBS 2003. The existing
Server has SCSI drives and need your advise on the new server.
As SATA drives are cheaper than SCSI has anyone used SATA in hardware Raid 0
and if so hows the performance vs SCSI?

--
Regards
David Hellewell


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: SBS 2003 Server Recommendations
    ... he's already smartly decided to use fast SCSI drives) ... Number one is INSTALL SBS 3 TIMES BEFORE YOU PUT A SYSTEM INTO PRODUCTION. ... Windows Server x64) and virtualising SBS, ... maybe using the host system as TS Apps mode server. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: SBS 2008 - Server Spec
    ... Ihave had sata drives work for years. ... Rare is the server I deliver that has a dedicated array just for data. ... So are you ready to spec a new SBS 2008 ML350 box with SATA drives? ... or SCSI, but then SAS is _pretty simply_ just a fast SCSI. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: SBS 2003 Server Recommendations
    ... he's already smartly decided to use fast SCSI drives) ... Number one is INSTALL SBS 3 TIMES BEFORE YOU PUT A SYSTEM INTO PRODUCTION. ... Windows Server x64) and virtualising SBS, ... maybe using the host system as TS Apps mode server. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: ????SATA or SCSI????
    ... I only discount SATA because of their lineage. ... I perceive SATA as having a higher failure rate than SCSI in a server ... Les Connor [SBS Community Member - SBS MVP] ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Just installed 2 more Gigs of RAM and SBS only shows 3.25 out of 4 Gigs total
    ... My SBS 4 box had 64 MB and I thought that really rocked. ... mirrored ~4 GB SCSI drives that held everything including Exchange. ... SGI server running art/production. ... This is interesting - on my relatively new SBS with 4 GB ram, ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)