Re: Security for "M" drive
- From: "Netnathan" <n.a.smith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 10:18:38 -0700
I have tried a different post to see if it can be more interesting....
-nn
"StudioTwo (Asus)" <studio_two@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:uCWfzINeFHA.2584@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Hello,
>
> Just to calrify...
>
> My understanding is that the actual MAPPING itself no longer serves any
> purpose. The article seems to describe how to remove the mapping (not the
> contents of what it is pointing to).
> Clearly that WOULD be a "No-No" of the biggest order (as these files are
> your mailboxes and public folders).
>
> In that respoect, it would be no different to removing any other mapping
> on your system.
>
> I'm surprised you haven't has more response to this issue. Have you tried
> the Exchange Newsgroup?
> Sorry, but can't help any further.
>
> Stephen
>
>
> "Netnathan" <n.a.smith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:OE6wPyBeFHA.456@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> The "M" drive is the Exchange Store drive. I have always been told to
>> not delete anything from the "M" drive. You damage the correlation
>> between what is on the Exchange store on the hard drive and the virtual
>> "M" drive.
>> I used to make room on the server's "C" drive by deleting old mail
>> (to/from the users) on "M" drive till I was told buy an MVP in this
>> newsgroup that this was a "no-no".
>>
>> -nn
>>
>> "StudioTwo" <studio_two@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:ONF6BEBeFHA.1040@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> I'm not sure that M: serves any valid purpose. Possibly it is a
>>> historical thing.
>>>
>>> There is a KBA (Q305145) for removing the mapping. But I assume that is
>>> for the one you normally see at the server console. I can't see how this
>>> would address the problem at the workstations.
>>>
>>> Anyways, see what you think. Please let us know how you get on.
>>>
>>> HTH
>>> Stephen
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Security for "M" drive
- From: Dave Claxon
- Re: Security for "M" drive
- References:
- Security for "M" drive
- From: Netnathan
- Re: Security for "M" drive
- From: StudioTwo
- Re: Security for "M" drive
- From: Netnathan
- Re: Security for "M" drive
- From: StudioTwo
- Re: Security for "M" drive
- From: Netnathan
- Re: Security for "M" drive
- From: StudioTwo \(Asus\)
- Security for "M" drive
- Prev by Date: Should users have access to their mailbox on the "M" drive?
- Next by Date: Exchange e-mail size settings are not taking affect
- Previous by thread: Re: Security for "M" drive
- Next by thread: Re: Security for "M" drive
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|