Re: Is it a good practice to have the system files within the RAID 5 setup?
- From: "Barry McConomy" <smile@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 22:00:58 -0400
Kevin
Thanks for the advice.
Barry
"Kevin Weilbacher [SBS-MVP]" <kweilbacMVP@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23dXudNjPFHA.3156@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Wow, the same question twice in one weekend!
>
> The answer is that as long as you have a hardware Raid controller, you can
> put your system partition on a Raid-5 disk system. All of my current
> SBS2000 and 2003 servers are configured with the system partition on
> Raid-5. They work fine.
>
> However, that's not to say that, given enough disk spindles, that a better
> scenario would be to use a two disk Raid-1 mirror setup for your systme
> partiton, and then a spearate Raid-5 setup for your data and applicaiton
> requirements.
>
> --
> Kevin Weilbacher [SBS-MVP]
> "The days pass by so quickly now, the nights are seldom long"
>
>
> "Barry McConomy" <smile@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:115iqdjo55cucef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Hi
>>
>> Raid 5 (Hardware Controller)
>>
>> Is it a good practice to have the system files within the RAID 5 setup?
>>
>> I seam to remember that you can't setup a Raid 5 within Windows 2000
>> Server using the Disk Manager
>>
>>
>> Regards
>> Barry
>>
>>
>>
>
>
.
- References:
- Is it a good practice to have the system files within the RAID 5 setup?
- From: Barry McConomy
- Re: Is it a good practice to have the system files within the RAID 5 setup?
- From: Kevin Weilbacher [SBS-MVP]
- Is it a good practice to have the system files within the RAID 5 setup?
- Prev by Date: Outlook not working for a new user
- Next by Date: Email forwarding to external email address
- Previous by thread: Re: Is it a good practice to have the system files within the RAID 5 setup?
- Next by thread: SBS 2000 New users added but no mailboxes problem.....Help
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
