Re: VPN Speed Question

Tech-Archive recommends: Fix windows errors by optimizing your registry

From: Merv Porter [SBS-MVP] (mwport_at_no_spam_hotmail.com)
Date: 03/01/05 

Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 11:48:34 -0500

Well, I'd say hardware based VPN is going to process requests faster but I
don't think this is going to be your bottleneck. 

-- 
Merv  Porter  [SBS MVP]
===================================
"DL" <DL@dl.com> wrote in message
news:U92dnavQJMYtB7nfRVn-ow@speakeasy.net...
> Need VPN for this, TS will not work. I was jsut wondering what would be
> faster in general
>
>
> "Merv Porter [SBS-MVP]" <mwport@no_spam_hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:ecaD$snHFHA.3376@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> > Not a direct answer, but either one could be excruciatingly slow
depending
> > on what type of data (and how much) you're throwing down the pipe.  A
> > better
> > solution may be Terminal Services or an RDC session to a Win XP Pro
> > workstation on the LAN.  This also can remove the impact from
> > viruses/trojans on the remote machines.
> >
> > -- 
> > Merv  Porter  [SBS MVP]
> > ===================================
> > "DL" <DL@dl.com> wrote in message
> > news:IoudnSfw2uhKHrnfRVn-vQ@speakeasy.net...
> >> What do people think would be a faster connection: Hardware based VPN
> >> (Linksys, Netgear-soho product) or SBS2K windows based VPN?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> Any documentation pertaining to VPN speed
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>

Relevant Pages