Re: Two Nics really needed?
From: Mike H (mkREMOVEhuskeyALL_at_THIShotmail.invalid)
Date: 12/31/04
- Previous message: SBSuser: "Re: Two Nics really needed?"
- In reply to: SBSuser: "Two Nics really needed?"
- Next in thread: David Elders: "Re: Two Nics really needed?"
- Reply: David Elders: "Re: Two Nics really needed?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 10:29:13 -0800
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 08:26:32 -0800, SBSuser wrote:
> I have the following scenario:
> T-1 Router - Cisco PIX firewall - Switch - Server and
> Workstations
> The PIX, server and WS's connect to the Switch.
>
> The PIX connects EThernet 0 to Internet thru the router
> and connects Ethernet 1(internal) to the Switch
>
> My boss insists I need to implement two Nic's on the SBS
> server. I think we do not need it.
>
> What's your opinion?
Watching this thread with interest. That's very close to my situation.
You didn't mention ISA Server.
-- Mike H
- Previous message: SBSuser: "Re: Two Nics really needed?"
- In reply to: SBSuser: "Two Nics really needed?"
- Next in thread: David Elders: "Re: Two Nics really needed?"
- Reply: David Elders: "Re: Two Nics really needed?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
