Two Nics really needed?
From: SBSuser (anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 12/31/04
- Next message: JohnJump: "Network Relocation Questions"
- Previous message: Brad Pears: "Re: Installing the Active Directory Schema Snap In"
- Next in thread: Merv Porter [SBS-MVP]: "Re: Two Nics really needed?"
- Reply: Merv Porter [SBS-MVP]: "Re: Two Nics really needed?"
- Reply: Mike H: "Re: Two Nics really needed?"
- Reply: Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]: "Re: Two Nics really needed?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 08:26:32 -0800
I have the following scenario:
T-1 Router - Cisco PIX firewall - Switch - Server and
Workstations
The PIX, server and WS's connect to the Switch.
The PIX connects EThernet 0 to Internet thru the router
and connects Ethernet 1(internal) to the Switch
My boss insists I need to implement two Nic's on the SBS
server. I think we do not need it.
What's your opinion?
- Next message: JohnJump: "Network Relocation Questions"
- Previous message: Brad Pears: "Re: Installing the Active Directory Schema Snap In"
- Next in thread: Merv Porter [SBS-MVP]: "Re: Two Nics really needed?"
- Reply: Merv Porter [SBS-MVP]: "Re: Two Nics really needed?"
- Reply: Mike H: "Re: Two Nics really needed?"
- Reply: Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]: "Re: Two Nics really needed?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
