Re: Is SBS 2003 suited for this client?
From: Richard Fagen (no_spam_at_my_isp.com)
Date: 11/30/04
- Next message: Jim Behning: "Re: SBS 2003 and more servers"
- Previous message: Jim Behning: "Re: Best method to upgrade"
- Next in thread: Dave Nickason [SBS MVP]: "Re: Is SBS 2003 suited for this client?"
- Maybe reply: Dave Nickason [SBS MVP]: "Re: Is SBS 2003 suited for this client?"
- Reply: Kevin Weilbacher [SBS-MVP]: "Re: Is SBS 2003 suited for this client?"
- Maybe reply: SuperGumby [SBS MVP]: "Re: Is SBS 2003 suited for this client?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 08:32:27 -0500
Hi Kevin,
That a great point. I know they currently pay some ridiculous monthly
fee ($500 Cdn) for a static IP address and some 'plan'. I am now
looking into all the details.
Richard
Kevin Weilbacher [SBS-MVP] wrote:
> my question doesn't have to do with SBS,. but to make sure they don't exceed
> the maximum bandwidth that your ISP will allow. I have one client I
> inherited running SBS 4.5 in the same scenario.They are an architect firm,
> and have huge drawings that they store on their server, and use FTP to
> access and transmit files.
>
- Next message: Jim Behning: "Re: SBS 2003 and more servers"
- Previous message: Jim Behning: "Re: Best method to upgrade"
- Next in thread: Dave Nickason [SBS MVP]: "Re: Is SBS 2003 suited for this client?"
- Maybe reply: Dave Nickason [SBS MVP]: "Re: Is SBS 2003 suited for this client?"
- Reply: Kevin Weilbacher [SBS-MVP]: "Re: Is SBS 2003 suited for this client?"
- Maybe reply: SuperGumby [SBS MVP]: "Re: Is SBS 2003 suited for this client?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]