Re: ISA Event

From: Jack (jack30_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 10/07/04


Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 14:05:43 +1000

c:\ netstat -an | find "443"
TCP 10.0.0.2:443 0.0.0.0 LISTENING
TCP 127.0.0.1:443 0.0.0.0 LISTENING
TCP 192.168.4.9:443 0.0.0.0 LISTENING

This is the right one.

"Jack" <jack30@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:evwFolBrEHA.3748@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Thats my problem i don't know how to bind 443 only to one interface i know
> 80 is not bound in iis anymore thanks to disableingsocketpooling but 443
> still is bound to both.
> Here is the details:
>
> c:\ netstat -an | find "443"
> TCP 10.0.0.2:443 0.0.0.0 LISTENING
> TCP 127.0.0.1 0.0.0.0 LISTENING
> TCP 192.168.4.9 0.0.0.0 LISTENING
>
> As you can see 443 is bound to everything.
> I ran the same command on 80 and 8080 and they are only bound to the 1
> interface.
> How do i fix it. It is very frustrating.
> Can you take isa of sbs and use it on a second machine connected to the
> router. That would fix the problem.
> Thanks
> Jack.
>
> "SuperGumby [SBS MVP]" <not@your.nellie> wrote in message
> news:uLXJwz6qEHA.3288@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> > OK, so try manually binding 443 only to the internal interface.
> >
> > not via a command, via IIS management.
> >
> > "Jack" <jack30@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:u37gnOzqEHA.3840@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> > > Hi
> > > I am not trying to put you guys down at all thats why i am here
seeking
> > > advise from MVP's i just get a bit defensive i suppose spending all
that
> > > money on microsoft courses does that especially when you get a problem
> you
> > > haven't covered in the courses and as i said earlier they don't teach
> > > anything about sbs only enterprise level like all the domain
controllers
> i
> > > have used have iis and isa on seperate boxes usually on 3 leg
perimiter
> > > networks. I understand that it is not just sbs as isa and iis on any
box
> > > would give the same grief even in a enterprise enviroment. You are
right
> > > and
> > > thats why i can't understand why when i ran the to do list it didn't
fix
> > > the
> > > problem on 443. Doesn't the iis section in the to do list unbind iis
> from
> > > port 80 not 80 and 443? I noticed i am not getting port 80 warnings in
> the
> > > event viewer. It only started when we created a certificate server on
> sbs
> > > so
> > > you have to use 443 to get it the eg: OWA working externally. If i
turn
> > > off
> > > the 443 ( uninstall the certificate) and use 80 again there is no
> problem
> > > as
> > > the to do list did its job if i go back to certificates then i get the
> > > warning in the event viewer.
> > > Thanks
> > > Jack.
> > > "SuperGumby [SBS MVP]" <not@your.nellie> wrote in message
> > > news:#4pML9sqEHA.3244@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> > >> Hi Jack,
> > >>
> > >> I left this alone till I was home rather than work.
> > >>
> > >> I'm sorry you have this idea that there is some MVP vs MCPE
thing,
> > > there
> > >> is no such item on my agenda.
> > >>
> > >> Think about it. If you had followed my advice you _COULD NOT_ be
> > >> receiving the same error message. IIS would no longer be bound to
your
> > >> external interface so would no longer be in conflict with the ISA
> > > listeners.
> > >>
> > >> You're right. The MVP award is not a certification. It is
> recognition
> > > of
> > >> efforts made with no expectation of reward.
> > >>
> > >> Why do we, or at least I, post links rather than explanations?
> > >> Because
> > > I
> > >> don't want to give a man a fish, I want him to learn how to fish.
That
> > >> and
> > >> the fact that if the link exists the problem has been resolved
> previously
> > >> and is probably better explained in a well thought out article than
my
> > > best
> > >> recollection of such.
> > >>
> > >> I will still claim that (my fellow MVP, grrrr, now it's an MVP vs
> MVP
> > >> WAR!!!! :) Chad's answer is wrong. In one foul swoop he advised to
> ignore
> > >> the wizards designed to handle this task in an SBS environment.
> > >>
> > >> BTW. Your 'error' (which it isn't, it is more an informational
> alert)
> > >> would occur on any system (ie. even those big corporate boxes) which
> had
> > > ISA
> > >> listeners and IIS bound to the same interface. It is in no way SBS
> > > specific.
> > >>
> > >> "Jack" <jack30@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > >> news:%233yRWpmqEHA.1160@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> > >> > The fix you reckon works didn't. i still get the same message in
the
> > > event
> > >> > viewer. I am not bothering with sbs2k i am installing 2003 at least
i
> > > can
> > >> > get it to work ok.
> > >> > It is funny how MVP's put down MCSE's when MVP isn't even a
> > > certification.
> > >> > It is really funny you can say we MVP's fix up problems MCSE did,
> you
> > >> > must
> > >> > be mental. Why don't you people go and pay some money and get a
> proper
> > >> > certification against your name? I have noticed all you guys do is
go
> > >> > to
> > >> > the
> > >> > knowledge base or paste a link to the knowledge base, well to pass
an
> > > exam
> > >> > you need to know how to fix and troubleshoot without having to use
> the
> > > ms
> > >> > website.
> > >> > Jack.
> > >> >
> > >> > Jack.
> > >> >
> > >> > "Chad A. Gross [SBS Community Member]"
> > >> > <chad.gross@laytonflower.nospam.com>
> > >> > wrote in message news:eCq3uHJpEHA.3592@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> > >> >> LOL . . . Mick, it's so nice to see that your penchant for
> subtlety
> > >> > hasn't
> > >> >> changed . . . ;^)
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Jack - for the record, he is right. The Configure IIS task on the
> To
> > > Do
> > >> >> List will disable socket pooling, and when you run the ICW you
have
> > >> >> the
> > >> >> option to publish your website, which will create the necessary
web
> > >> >> publishing rule within ISA.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> --
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Chad A. Gross - SBS MVP
> > >> >> SBS ROCKS!
> > >> >>
> > >> >> www.msmvps.com/cgross
> > >> >> www.gosbs.org
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> SuperGumby [SBS MVP] wrote:
> > >> >> > tickles my fancy that does.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > The man who gives the right answer is lambasted while the man
> giving
> > >> >> > the wrong one is thanked.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > "Jack" <jack30@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > >> >> > news:#q9twSHpEHA.896@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> > >> >> >> Thanks Chad
> > >> >> >> Thats the answer i was after and all i wanted from the start.
> > >> >> >> I wasn't having a go at dudes that use sbs i was having a go
at
> > >> >> >> microsoft as in all my courses and tests there is no sbs
> questions
> > >> >> >> they don't teach you about how to run sbs server studying mcse.
I
> > >> >> >> realised it was different unlike some people i know that only
use
> > >> >> >> enterprise and have egos thinking they can fix all ms products
I
> > >> >> >> came here so I don't stuff the sbs server up eg: I have never
> used
> > >> >> >> a
> > >> >> >> domain controller that pops mail i am used to mail servers so
> that
> > >> >> >> was an eye opener as exchange enterprise doesn't come with any
> pop
> > >> >> >> connector.
> > >> >> >> But the good thing is now i will know both worlds even though i
> am
> > >> >> >> not used to running so many wizards i will learn them so thanks
> > >> >> >> again.
> > >> >> >> Cheers
> > >> >> >> Jack
> > >> >> >> "Chad A. Gross [SBS Community Member]"
> > >> >> >> <chad.gross@laytonflower.nospam.com> wrote in message
> > >> >> >> news:ugxRLqDpEHA.648@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> > >> >> >>> Jack -
> > >> >> >>>
> > >> >> >>> It sounds like you're trying to bind an IIS website to port
443
> on
> > >> >> >>> your external interface. This isn't going to happen because
the
> > >> >> >>> ISA web listeners are bound to 80 & 443 on your external
> > >> >> >>> interface.
> > >> >> >>> What you want to do is create a web publishing rule in ISA.
> Open
> > >> >> >>> ISA Management, expand Servers & Arrays | <servername> |
> > >> >> >>> Publishing
> > >> >> >>> | Web Publing Rules.
> > >> >> > Click
> > >> >> >>> Action | New | Rule. Follow the wizard to create a new web
> > >> >> >>> publishing rule to publish your web site.
> > >> >> >>>
> > >> >> >>> The reason you want to do it this way (instead of directly
> binding
> > >> >> >>> the website to the external interface) is to take advantage of
> the
> > >> >> >>> application-level filtering that ISA gives you.
> > >> >> >>>
> > >> >> >>> As for the wizards, they're there so we can easily & quickly
fix
> > >> >> >>> an
> > >> >> >>> SBS and get it to a recommended configuration after an
> Enterprise
> > >> >> >>> MCSE screws it up . . . ;^) That is nothing against you
> > >> >> >>> personally - most smallbiz IT consultants would have a hard
time
> > >> >> >>> adjusting to an enterprise deployment. The big difference is
> that
> > >> >> >>> we know we'd have to learn new things to fit into that
> > >> >> >>> environment.
> > >> >> >>> All to often, the enterprise level tech assumes that SBS is
just
> > >> >> >>> these 4 products installed on one box. What they overlook is
> that
> > >> >> >>> SBS is much more than the sum of it's parts, and the fact that
> we
> > >> >> >>> have IIS, Exchange & ISA on our one & only DC means that we do
> > >> >> >>> things slightly differently. More often than not, they don't
> > >> >> >>> respect that they may have to learn something to get this box
to
> > >> >> >>> sing. All of us have our own real-world experiences of
cleaning
> > >> >> >>> up
> > >> >> >>> after the enterprise MCSE who tried to set up SBS . . . :^)
> > >> >> >>>
> > >> >> >>> As for the security - we're all aware that SBS breaks MS' own
> > >> >> >>> rules
> > >> >> >>> regarding ISA - and we'd love to be able to pull that off and
> put
> > >> >> >>> in on a separate server. However, our threat vectors down
here
> > >> >> >>> are
> > >> >> >>> slightly different that the enterprise. Our main threat isn't
> the
> > >> >> >>> fact that our ISA is on our DC - no, our main threat is our
> > >> >> >>> desktops, and poorly written smallbiz apps (QuickBooks) that
> > >> >> >>> require local Administrator rights, etc.
> > >> >> >>>
> > >> >> >>> Back to the wizards - you do realize that the wizards write
log
> > >> >> >>> files that tell you what they did?
> > >> >> >>>
> > >> >> >>> --
> > >> >> >>>
> > >> >> >>> Chad A. Gross - SBS MVP
> > >> >> >>> SBS ROCKS!
> > >> >> >>>
> > >> >> >>> www.msmvps.com/cgross
> > >> >> >>> www.gosbs.org
> > >> >> >>>
> > >> >> >>>
> > >> >> >>> Jack wrote:
> > >> >> >>>> Mate, just face the fact that you don't know how to fix my
> > >> >> >>>> problem. I don't know by what you mean the hard way? I ran
the
> > >> >> >>>> wizards in the to do list and it didn't fix the problem just
> like
> > >> >> >>>> you recommended. SBS is basicly made for companys who don't
> > >> >> >>>> really have a fulltime administrator and thats why there is
so
> > >> >> >>>> many wizards. You dont get all those wizards in enterprise
> > >> >> >>>> edition
> > >> >> >>>> and that makes a whole lot of difference when
troubleshooting
> a
> > >> >> >>>> problem as you need to know the program not just how to run a
> > >> >> >>>> wizard. How do you know a wizard worked as they don't tell
you
> > >> >> >>>> where wizard makes changes so how can you troubleshoot a
> problem
> > >> >> >>>> if you don't know where the exact changes are made.I would
> rather
> > >> >> >>>> make the changes myself even though it might take a bit
longer
> at
> > >> >> >>>> lease you know what happened step by step if there is a
problem
> > >> >> >>>> down the track so you know where to fix the problem .And how
> can
> > >> >> >>>> you undo wizards. You can't. You just rerun them. dodgy.
> > >> >> >>>> Jack
> > >> >> >>>>
> > >> >> >>>>
> > >> >> >>>> "SuperGumby [SBS MVP]" <not@your.nellie> wrote in message
> > >> >> >>>> news:#YN6t43oEHA.3460@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> > >> >> >>>>> and I feel sorry for people who do things the hard way.
> > >> >> >>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>> "Jack" <jack2007a@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > >> >> >>>>> news:#j996I3oEHA.800@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> > >> >> >>>>>> Hi, when i said i am new to sbs 2k i mean't new to having
all
> > >> >> >>>>>> apps on the same box. I use windows Advanced server 2003 in
> an
> > >> >> >>>>>> enterprise with a multiple domain structure with seperate
> boxes
> > >> >> >>>>>> for ISA, Exchange etc. I am currently Studying my MCSE 2003
> and
> > >> >> >>>>>> as the books say.....Don't have isa and iss on the same
box.
> MS
> > >> >> >>>>>> recommend having the seperate scenario for security
purposes
> > >> >> >>>>>> even exchange should be seperate. Basicly SBS breaks their
> own
> > >> >> >>>>>> rules. I have also noticed that alot of the services are
not
> > >> >> >>>>>> even being used on sbs, What a waste. I feel sorry for
people
> > >> >> >>>>>> who just use sbs as they don't get to see the full function
> of
> > >> >> >>>>>> Forest wide domain structure and all the services that come
> > >> >> >>>>>> with
> > >> >> >>>>>> it. To answer your question i did use the to do list. The
iis
> > >> >> >>>>>> section in yhe list just runs a wizard which does exactly
the
> > >> >> >>>>>> same thing as i did in the command prompt (Disabled
> > >> >> >>>>>> socketpooling) In sbs 2003 it is easy to do using httpcfg
but
> > >> >> >>>>>> not 2k.
> > >> >> >>>>>> I just need to know how to disablesocketpooling for port
443
> > >> >> >>>>>> rather than just 80 without having to change the port which
> > >> >> >>>>>> will
> > >> >> >>>>>> work. Thanks
> > >> >> >>>>>> Jack.
> > >> >> >>>>>> "SuperGumby [SBS MVP]" <not@your.nellie> wrote in message
> > >> >> >>>>>> news:u8thTa8nEHA.3968@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> > >> >> >>>>>>> It says nothing of the sort, there is an inference that
> socket
> > >> >> >>>>>>> pooling has been disabled, if you stretch your imagination
a
> > >> >> >>>>>>> long way, all you really present is a single line of
netstat
> > >> >> >>>>>>> output. But hey, what's the big deal.
> > >> >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>> More important than any measure you may have manually
taken
> > >> >> >>>>>>> I'm
> > >> >> >>>>>>> interested to find out whether you have completed (at
least)
> > > the
> > >> >> >>>>>>> to-do list items I refer to and hopefully the full to-do
> list.
> > > I
> > >> >> >>>>>>> don't want to know if you have manually performed the
> > >> >> >>>>>>> functions
> > >> >> >>>>>>> you believe are accomplished by the to-do list items, I
> wanna
> > >> >> >>>>>>> know if you have completed the to-do list. Main reason
being
> > >> >> >>>>>>> that someone who had completed the to-do list would not
> > > normally
> > >> >> >>>>>>> experience the problem you are experiencing.
> > >> >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>> Why do you wish to move the 'exchange virtual servers'?
what
> > >> >> >>>>>>> do
> > >> >> >>>>>>> you believe you will accomplish by doing this? As the
system
> > >> >> >>>>>>> is
> > >> >> >>>>>>> SBS no component of the SBS applications can be moved to
> > > another
> > >> >> >>>>>>> box, but, for example, you could easily set up an SMTP
> service
> > >> >> >>>>>>> on another box, it would just need to be an SMTP service
(or
> > >> >> >>>>>>> virtual server) which IS NOT part of SBS Exchange. eg. GFI
> ME
> > >> >> >>>>>>> can be set up as an SMTP filter on a front end which feeds
> SBS
> > >> >> >>>>>>> exchange, I'm not suggesting this is recommended let alone
> > >> >> >>>>>>> advised but it is a possibility.
> > >> >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>> "Jack" <jack2007a@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > >> >> >>>>>>> news:ulJk936nEHA.536@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> > >> >> >>>>>>>> I disabled socketpooling If you read my first article
> > >> >> >>>>>>>> properly
> > >> >> >>>>>>>> it says that. I have done what i should but sbs2k is
> useless.
> > >> >> >>>>>>>> I will move the web pages to another server and if i do
> that
> > >> >> >>>>>>>> is it possible to move the exchange virtual servers to a
> > >> >> >>>>>>>> member server on my network?
> > >> >> >>>>>>>> cheers
> > >> >> >>>>>>>> Jack.
> > >> >> >>>>>>>> "SuperGumby [SBS MVP]" <not@your.nellie> wrote in message
> > >> >> >>>>>>>> news:#20YGAsnEHA.2140@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>> go through the to-do list. 'Configure IIS' (will disable
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>> socket pooling and bind the IIS listeners to the
internal
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>> only) and 'Connect to the Internet'.
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>> --
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>> Mick Malloy
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>> http://www.micropol.com.au
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>> "jack" <jack2007a@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>> news:edIEBwrnEHA.2388@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> There is 2 nics and here is My ipconfig:
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Windows 2000 IP Configuration
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : server
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Primary DNS Suffix . . . . . . . : domain name
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Hybrid
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : Yes
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> DNS Suffix Search List. . . . . . : domain name
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Ethernet adapter local:
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Description . . . . . . . . . . . : HP NC7760 Gigabit
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Server
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Adapter Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : mac address
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.0.0.2
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . :
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.0.0.2
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Primary WINS Server . . . . . . . : 10.0.0.2
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Ethernet adapter external:
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Description . . . . . . . . . . . : HP NC3123 Fast
> Ethernet
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> NIC Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : mac address
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.4.9
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.4.11
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.0.0.2
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> "SuperGumby [SBS MVP]" <not@your.nellie> wrote in
message
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> news:erix$zqnEHA.3876@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> looks like a single NIC SBS? correct?
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> please give us the output of 'ipconfig /all >
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> c:\ipconfig.txt' from the server.
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Mick Malloy
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.micropol.com.au
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> "Jack" <jack2007a@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> news:OLR6ksqnEHA.1304@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> I am new to sbs and i need some help with publishing
0n
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> isa. I keep gettig the error below in the event
viewer:
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Web Proxy service failed to bind its socket to
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> 192.168.4.9
> > >> >> >>>> port
> > >> >> >>>>>>> 443.
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> This
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> could be caused by another service that is already
> using
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> the
> > >> >> >>>>> same
> > >> >> >>>>>>>> port
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> or
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> by
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> a network interface card that is not functional. The
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> error
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> code specified in
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> the Data area of the event properties indicates the
> cause
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> of the failure. For more information about this
event,
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> see
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> ISA Server Help.
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> I looked on the web for help and did a netstat -an
and
> > > this
> > >> >> >>>> is
> > >> >> >>>>>> what
> > >> >> >>>>>>> i
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> get:
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> TCP 192.168.4.9:443 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING.
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> How do i stop this error. I found an article to
disable
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> socketpooling on
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> the
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> sbs if isa and iss are on the same box but it didn't
> seem
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> to
> > >> >> >>>> do
> > >> >> >>>>>> any
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> good.
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Any help would be much appreciated.
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Jack.
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Exchange Service Pack 1 & OWA
    ... | Subject: Re: Exchange Service Pack 1 & OWA ... |>>Although the "fix" you post does allow one to login without entering the ... |>>name - until such time as Microsoft releases an updated patch. ... For SBS 4.5 issues, post to: ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: HELP - cannot install updates on users computers
    ... Below is the fix. ... If you think installing patches and security updates is expensive, ... Les Connor [SBS Community Member - SBS MVP] ... for a policy of Remove Access to use all Windows Update Features. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Exchange Service Pack 1 & OWA
    ... | Subject: Re: Exchange Service Pack 1 & OWA ... |>>Although the "fix" you post does allow one to login without entering the ... |>>name - until such time as Microsoft releases an updated patch. ... For SBS 4.5 issues, post to: ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: OWA Premium Client Page not loading completely.
    ... There has been a fix out for quite a while, so I'm presuming this is a new ... Run Windows Update on the SBS first - and install all the critical updates. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: 1005/DSRESTOR error after SP1
    ... I have seen this error on each and every SBS that was upgraded to SP1. ... have also seen that after some reboots it can be gone. ... Simply ignore this error for now, there will be a fix later, although I ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)