Re: Remote Desktop
From: Adam (adam.rippon_at_sydneytech.com.au)
Date: 06/13/04
- Next message: John: "Re: Alternate ip"
- Previous message: Henry Craven: "Re: Server Crashing...help"
- In reply to: Kevin Weilbacher [SBS-MVP]: "Re: Remote Desktop"
- Next in thread: Adam: "Re: Remote Desktop"
- Reply: Adam: "Re: Remote Desktop"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 23:43:20 +1000
thanks all for your replies... that was it.
"Kevin Weilbacher [SBS-MVP]" <kweilbacMVP@gte.net> wrote in message
news:#5H898TUEHA.2672@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> I install customer systems with the default 192.168.16.x schema; but my
home
> system is installed using the 10.0.0.x schema not only to avoid the
> discussed problem, but because I like to have a visible distinction with
IP
> addresses between my server and the customer server ... just in case.
>
> --
> Kevin Weilbacher [SBS-MVP]
>
> "The days pass by so quickly now, the nights are seldom long"
> "Duncan McC" <hard@work.ok> wrote in message
> news:MPG.1b36dcc9ef18c6a989771@msnews.microsoft.com...
> > In article <ec#xZ#OUEHA.3332@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl>,
> > mwport@no_spam_hotmail.com says...
> > > Yep.. most likely a problem. For proper routing to occur, the LAN
> networks
> > > have to be in unique subnets. One can be 192.168.16.x; the other then
> has
> > > to be in a different subnet (like 192.168.17.x).
> >
> > so what you're saying here Merv, is that is you have two default
> > configured SBS (say 2000, this is the 2000 NG) - then - they won't VPN
> > to each other due the subnetting? (thought that was the 255.255.255.0)
> >
> > --
> > Duncan
>
>
- Next message: John: "Re: Alternate ip"
- Previous message: Henry Craven: "Re: Server Crashing...help"
- In reply to: Kevin Weilbacher [SBS-MVP]: "Re: Remote Desktop"
- Next in thread: Adam: "Re: Remote Desktop"
- Reply: Adam: "Re: Remote Desktop"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
