Re: SMB Signing question, SBS2k
From: Kevin Weilbacher [SBS-MVP] (kweilbacMVP_at_gte.net)
Date: 05/01/04
- Next message: Dave Stoecker: "Re: Help!! Exchange problem??"
- Previous message: Roger Crawford: "Re: Help!! Exchange problem??"
- In reply to: John: "SMB Signing question, SBS2k"
- Next in thread: John: "Re: SMB Signing question, SBS2k"
- Reply: John: "Re: SMB Signing question, SBS2k"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 1 May 2004 16:29:52 -0400
it's still an issue with SBS2003, and you still need to do the changes that
you did - at least I had to.
-- Kevin Weilbacher [SBS-MVP] "The days pass by so quickly now, the nights are seldom long" "John" <john@dontreply.net> wrote in message news:5IDkc.6913$k24.4438@fed1read01... > Is the SMB signing issue with XP PRO sp1 and SBS2k still an issue? > > I thought I had the SMB issue fixed until this week. At a client's site, XP > Pro PCs with SP1 were working great with SBS2k. > > Until yesterday, several users complained that copying file to the server > was now extremely slow. > > I had an open issue with MS and had two patches they gave me, 825760, > 826722, that resolved some of my Office 2000 issues with SBS2k/Win2k SP4. > And copies were fast and Word was crashing less often. > > Now, the copying is slow again. I went searching, found KB 329170. But > 825760 and 826722 have later file dates than 329170. > > Yesterday, It would take 20 seconds to copy 200k. Not even a megabyte. But > only from XP Pro PCS. Win2k PCs were fine. > > I tried the usual things prior to making the SMB change: > > 1)checked for spyware, none. Used adaware, Spybot, and Spysweeper > > 2)checked for viruses - none found. Definitions are the latest. > > 3)checked for any odd startup files using msconfig > > 4 )sp1 installed > > 5)all critical patches installed > > 6)server is virus free > > 7)server event viewer is clear of errors > > 8)hard coded the speed of the NIC but this did not make a difference, > > Actually, when I hard coded the NICs at 100/full or 100/half, the copying > was worse > > 9)Verified in the advanced settings of my network were ok > > 10)DNS settings were correct in ipconfig /all. > > I ended up doing the following. But why of all a sudden was this necessary? > > The following resolved the problem, solution from Microsoft. > > > I did this first. > > WORKAROUND > To work around this problem, use Group Policy settings to turn off SMB > signing. To do so, set the Default Domain Controller policy settings to > Disabled: > Click Start, point to Programs, point to Administrative Tools, and then > click Active Directory Users and Computers. > Right-click the Domain Controllers organizational unit, and then click > Properties. > Click the Group Policies tab. > Click Default Domain Controllers Policy, and then click Edit. > Go to the following location: > Computer Configuration\Windows Settings\Security Settings\Local > Policies\Security Options > If any of the following policy settings are set to Enabled, double click the > setting, click to select the Define this policy setting check box, click > Disabled, and then click OK. > > NOTE: By default, only one setting is set to Enabled. > Digitally sign client communication (always) > Digitally sign client communication (when possible) > Digitally sign server communication (always) > Digitally sign server communication (when possible) > > I looked at my LANMANSERVER and LANMANWORKSTATION registry settings and > enablesecuritysignature and requiresecuritysignature are both 0 for all. > Which they should be after making the SBS server change. > > > I did this second. > > Also, in DNS, changed "allow secure updates only" to "allow dynamic > updates." > > I restarted the server twice and all workstations once. > > What happened? > > The copies are now fast like they were before. I wonder if the last set of > critical updates made things worse? > > Is the SMB Issue there with SBS2003? > > > Thanks, all. > > John > > > > > >
- Next message: Dave Stoecker: "Re: Help!! Exchange problem??"
- Previous message: Roger Crawford: "Re: Help!! Exchange problem??"
- In reply to: John: "SMB Signing question, SBS2k"
- Next in thread: John: "Re: SMB Signing question, SBS2k"
- Reply: John: "Re: SMB Signing question, SBS2k"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|