Re: Antivirus

From: Jeff L (newsgroupsremoveandunderscore_jeff_at_availabletech.net)
Date: 04/25/04 

Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 01:53:44 -0400

I use Symantec Enterprise. It is good but expensive for small orgs.

It has some nice features like Spam filtering. It takes a lot of work to
filter the spam though.

I wish someone would come out with a drag and drop spam filter. you drag a
spam in to a folder and it prompts you for the proteries you want to filter
on.

Anyway Symantec is OK.

"John" <john@nospam.com.au> wrote in message
news:O$tIerlKEHA.4032@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> anyone use CA etrust antivirus products?
>
> what do you think about ease of deployment, management and protection?
>
> I tried installing it a few years but had problems, so stopped using it.
> Just wondering if CA got there act together.
>
> Looking at implementing AV product that fully supports SBS, clients,
> Exchange etc All in one product, what do the SBS
> community recommend?
>
>

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Antivirus
    ... I Would recommend Norman Antivirus, it has won several awards and has the ... > It has some nice features like Spam filtering. ... > I wish someone would come out with a drag and drop spam filter. ... >> Exchange etc All in one product, what do the SBS ...
    (microsoft.public.backoffice.smallbiz2000)
  • Re: Antivirus on SBS 2003
    ... I was liking Trend CSM Security for SMB, but the spam filtering truly sucks. ... I am planning to implement my first SBS 2003 server in the coming months. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Spam Filtering Recommendations
    ... Client/Server/Messaging Suite for SMB. ... Chad A. Gross - SBS MVP ... > We are currently using SBS2000 without any additional spam filtering ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: filtering email / terminal server
    ... Consider running a server based spam filtering solution. ... > I have an SBS 2003 box and a 2003 terminal server. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
Loading