Re: Seperate networks using 1 Gateway
From: SuperGumby [SBS MVP] (not_at_your.nellie)
Date: 03/22/04
- Next message: Marina Roos [SBS-MVP]: "Re: First Installation"
- Previous message: Dave Nickason [SBS MVP]: "Re: Task Manager"
- In reply to: IBC: "Re: Seperate networks using 1 Gateway"
- Next in thread: IBC: "Re: Seperate networks using 1 Gateway"
- Reply: IBC: "Re: Seperate networks using 1 Gateway"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 10:07:21 +1100
The idea with ascii art is to keep it as simple possible.
Standard W2K server can use ICS (I think) or RRAS NAT to perform the router
function provided by SBS.
If you remove the NAT router and have
internet
|
|
switch -- cafe
|
|
W2K RRAS NAT (2 nics)
|
|
client PC's
you need to be able to attain multiple IP's at the internet point and lose
the security from external probes that the NAT router would give.
-- Mick Malloy http://www.micropol.com.au "IBC" <spamityspam@spam.spam> wrote in message news:%23iNXsYDEEHA.628@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > LOL, more or less, thats it. Sorry for the disgrace I posted....it looked > fine when I typed it....=P > > In my case, the NAT Router would also be the switch (actually a hub). > > This doesn't work if you replace SBS with a W2K server though, right? All > clients on this network point straight to the gateway, so the only way to > sperate the 'cafe' off the local network would be to have a second NAT > router between the external router and the W2K server.....clear as mud? > > > "SuperGumby [SBS MVP]" <not@your.nellie> wrote in message > news:O5R4#ssDEHA.2652@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > > yep, your diagram sux. > > > > was it supposed to look like this? > > > > public IP > > | > > | > > NAT Router > > | > > | > > switch ----------- Cafe > > | > > | > > SBS external > > SBS Internal > > | > > | > > switch > > | > > | > > SBS client LAN > > > > > > "IBC" <spamityspam@spam.spam> wrote in message > > news:#I#kshTDEHA.3236@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > > > I think I have this all straight, but I'd love some input. > > > > > > I have been asked to investigate the idea of internet access for clients > > > that come to the business. I INSISTED these clients be on a totally > > seperate > > > network because we all know how people treat equipment that isn't theirs > > to > > > maintain. I'd like to route both the work network and the 'cafe' ' > through > > > the existing broadband connection. Here are my thoughts on how this is > > going > > > to work, please let me know if I'm overdoing it. I'm miserable at text > > > formatted diagrams, so please bear with me. > > > > > > INTERNET > > > | > > > FIXED WAN IP MODEM DEVICE > > > with DHCP or PROGRAMABLE LAN > > > ADDRESS > > > | > > > NAT ROUTER with 5 port Hub > > > USING DHCP for 10.0.0.0 Network > > > With DHCP Reservations possible__________________ > > > | > > > | > > > Cafe' Clients assigned Dynamic IPs | > > > > > > | > > > External > > NIC > > > of SBS > > > > > > | > > > > > > 192.168.1.1 Internal network > > > > > > > > > Basically I don't want any traffic at all to cross from the cafe' > clients > > to > > > the SBS, and if the internal interface on the SBS is a different subnet > > the > > > traffic can't cross, right? > > > > > > Without SBS, you would need a second NAT router I believe to make the > > break > > > between the two. > > > > > > Thanks for any input. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
- Next message: Marina Roos [SBS-MVP]: "Re: First Installation"
- Previous message: Dave Nickason [SBS MVP]: "Re: Task Manager"
- In reply to: IBC: "Re: Seperate networks using 1 Gateway"
- Next in thread: IBC: "Re: Seperate networks using 1 Gateway"
- Reply: IBC: "Re: Seperate networks using 1 Gateway"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|