Re: Rack vs. tower servers
From: Henry Craven (IUnknown_at_Dot.Nyet)
Date: 09/07/04
- Previous message: Marina Roos [SBS-MVP]: "Re: W2k, TS remote admin Q."
- In reply to: Steve Foster: "Re: Rack vs. tower servers"
- Next in thread: Steve Foster: "Re: Rack vs. tower servers"
- Reply: Steve Foster: "Re: Rack vs. tower servers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 04:56:58 +1000
Guess it must be local then.
Here a 42RU will set you back AU$ 2,500.00 for the enclosure alone.
Extractor fan Kit AU$ 250.00, Power Distribution unit AU$ 250.00,
Sliding Tray AU$ 200.00. etc... Sounds like I'd much rather be paying
your prices.
--
Henry Craven {SBS-MVP}
Melbourne Australia
"Steve Foster" <steve.foster@picamar.co.uk> wrote in message
news:xn0dmzk8siumjbu003@msnews.microsoft.com...
> Henry Craven wrote:
>
> > If the client is willing to pay for the price of a Rack, patch
panels
> > and Rackable modules I'm the last to complain. I even recommend
> > secure wiring closets be built. - none of it has an impact on
> > performance though.
>
> Racks are not expensive (around the price of a single desktop PC of
> middling-spec). The patch panels probably already exist (for the
> structured cabling), and most networking infrastructure is supplied in
> rack-mountable sizes anyway (so no additional cost).
>
> --
> Steve Foster
- Previous message: Marina Roos [SBS-MVP]: "Re: W2k, TS remote admin Q."
- In reply to: Steve Foster: "Re: Rack vs. tower servers"
- Next in thread: Steve Foster: "Re: Rack vs. tower servers"
- Reply: Steve Foster: "Re: Rack vs. tower servers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
