Re: Local Admin rights- RFC
From: James Reather (james.news_at_reather.com)
Date: 03/11/04
- Next message: Allan Sabiski: "Re: What server anti-virus software do you recommend?"
- Previous message: news.microsoft.com: "Re: Problems joining workstations to the domain"
- In reply to: Mal Osborne: "Re: Local Admin rights- RFC"
- Next in thread: Phil Partridge: "Re: Local Admin rights- RFC"
- Reply: Phil Partridge: "Re: Local Admin rights- RFC"
- Reply: Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]: "Re: Local Admin rights- RFC"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 16:08:29 +0100
Mal Osborne wrote:
> The big problem here is usually 3rd party apps. A lot of programs
> require that the user be an administrator to function. It is
> difficult to convince companies not to use applications that are
> poorly written.
...although when I deployed SBS2003 at one site, I discovered that WinFax
Pro 10.0x will run with Power User, rather than Administrator rights. So,
the INTERACTIVE account is a member of each local Power Users group, and so
everyone's a plain old domain user, but get Power User rights when they log
in to a machine.
I certainly helps me sleep at night knowing that the end users aren't all
local adminstrators :-)
James
- Next message: Allan Sabiski: "Re: What server anti-virus software do you recommend?"
- Previous message: news.microsoft.com: "Re: Problems joining workstations to the domain"
- In reply to: Mal Osborne: "Re: Local Admin rights- RFC"
- Next in thread: Phil Partridge: "Re: Local Admin rights- RFC"
- Reply: Phil Partridge: "Re: Local Admin rights- RFC"
- Reply: Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]: "Re: Local Admin rights- RFC"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|