Re: Rating Database Access 2003
- From: "Jeff Boyce" <nonsense@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 13:32:08 -0800
From your description, it sounds like you are asking if your Access table(s)should look like a spread***. You can do that, but you won't get much
advantage of Access' relationally-oriented features and functions if you
feed it '*** data.
If you are not familiar with the topics of normalization and relational
database design, there's a steep learning curve in your future before you'll
be able to make (full-er) use of Access.
If you ONLY need to use Access to report on data, could you simply link to
your Excel spread*** itself and generate the reports?
Regards
Jeff Boyce
Microsoft Office/Access MVP
"debinnyc" <debinnyc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:51B8E12D-3541-4204-BFB2-1583F9EC43F6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I am trying to create a database to record performance measures for
individual people in an office. I will need to record multiple samples per
month, based on production. My first thought was to create a single table
with all the fields, but I see in other discussion topics there is a way
to
create multiple tables and link them together.
Here is an example of what I want:
Empl Id, name, dept, supv name, audit number
Quality measure 1 (check box) excellent , (check box) good, etc...
point
value
.
.
average point value
notes
I am assigning a unique id to each record through an auto number field
such
as audit number.
So, if I have thirty employees and I perform 4 audits per month per
employee, I can record each audit, and analyze each employee's performance
over time based on scoring.
Does that make sense? I hope so.
Sorry, I have used access for a while from a reporting standpoint but have
little experience in design. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Rating Database Access 2003
- From: debinnyc
- Re: Rating Database Access 2003
- Prev by Date: Re: DB Table Design
- Next by Date: Re: Rating Database Access 2003
- Previous by thread: Re: DB Table Design
- Next by thread: Re: Rating Database Access 2003
- Index(es):