Re: Multi-Field Primary Key
- From: "BruceM" <bamoob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 13:10:19 -0500
So I'm the chump who's being duped by the slick-talking autonumber heretics,
is that it?
I can find all sorts of arguments pro and con on any topic, so the existence
of advocacy for one position or the other does nothing by itself to sway my
views. Autonumber works fine for my purposes, but my point, which you
ignored, was that even if I was to accept your position on "natural" keys,
what is "natural" about a phone number? Unless you are sorting by phone
number to find gaps or something like that the ordering of a phone number
field is surely as arbitrary as an autonumber field.
"Jamie Collins" <jamiecollins@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1168265553.697929.225810@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
BruceM wrote:
I'll just mention that a many people, including Access MVPs, consider
autonumber to be a perfectly acceptable and efficient choice for PK.
I'll just mention that many people, including the Emperor's most
trusted advisors, considered his New Clothes to be a perfectly
acceptable choice for a state occasion <g>.
Researching a natural key can involve time and effort (though usually a
google search will quickly reveal an industry-standard key, ISO
standard, etc). Designing your own key can be hard work. Is there
anything simpler than incrementing an integer? Sure, an integer that is
incremented for you!
It is mere coincidence in this case that 'the easy way out' is the not
'the road less travelled'?
Jamie.
--
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Multi-Field Primary Key
- From: Jamie Collins
- Re: Multi-Field Primary Key
- From: Rick Brandt
- Re: Multi-Field Primary Key
- References:
- Re: Multi-Field Primary Key
- From: Allen Browne
- Re: Multi-Field Primary Key
- From: Jamie Collins
- Re: Multi-Field Primary Key
- From: nickh
- Re: Multi-Field Primary Key
- From: BruceM
- Re: Multi-Field Primary Key
- From: Jamie Collins
- Re: Multi-Field Primary Key
- Prev by Date: Re: Many, Many, Many........ One? I'm lost
- Next by Date: Re: Multi-Field Primary Key
- Previous by thread: Re: Multi-Field Primary Key
- Next by thread: Re: Multi-Field Primary Key
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading