Re: Multi-Field Primary Key
- From: "Jamie Collins" <jamiecollins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 8 Jan 2007 06:12:33 -0800
BruceM wrote:
I'll just mention that a many people, including Access MVPs, consider
autonumber to be a perfectly acceptable and efficient choice for PK.
I'll just mention that many people, including the Emperor's most
trusted advisors, considered his New Clothes to be a perfectly
acceptable choice for a state occasion <g>.
Researching a natural key can involve time and effort (though usually a
google search will quickly reveal an industry-standard key, ISO
standard, etc). Designing your own key can be hard work. Is there
anything simpler than incrementing an integer? Sure, an integer that is
incremented for you!
It is mere coincidence in this case that 'the easy way out' is the not
'the road less travelled'?
Jamie.
--
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Multi-Field Primary Key
- From: BruceM
- Re: Multi-Field Primary Key
- References:
- Re: Multi-Field Primary Key
- From: Allen Browne
- Re: Multi-Field Primary Key
- From: Jamie Collins
- Re: Multi-Field Primary Key
- From: nickh
- Re: Multi-Field Primary Key
- From: BruceM
- Re: Multi-Field Primary Key
- Prev by Date: Re: Primary Keys
- Next by Date: Re: relations between tables lost: DBase to big?
- Previous by thread: Re: Multi-Field Primary Key
- Next by thread: Re: Multi-Field Primary Key
- Index(es):
Loading