Re: Field 'disappears' from table ...
- From: "Allen Browne" <AllenBrowne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 20:58:25 +0800
If this happens with one particular table, it might be understandable. If
you can repeat this with any table in any database, I have no idea what's
going on.
A column can disappear from Data*** view quite easily. A field
disappearing from Table view is rare.
It might help to programmatically loop through the fields in this TableDef,
and see if Access reports any that don't show in table design view. Here's
the code to loop the fields:
http://allenbrowne.com/func-06.html
It could be informative to examine the Attributes of the field as well, to
see if they are hidden or system fields.
I assume this is not a replicated database.
--
Allen Browne - Microsoft MVP. Perth, Western Australia.
Tips for Access users - http://allenbrowne.com/tips.html
Reply to group, rather than allenbrowne at mvps dot org.
"Robin" <robin_irving@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23vRf7O2yGHA.4368@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
That's not exactly what's happening... On odd occasions I make a new field
in design view, save the table and switch to data entry mode - and the
*new* field is nowhere to be seen. So I think, 'duh, forgot to save my
changes' and attempt to remake the field (using the same name) and get the
message that it can't be done as a field with that name already exists...
So instead of calling my new field "NewField", I call it "NewField1" - now
when I go to enter data, "NewField" is visible but "NewField1" is not.
So the last made field is always invisible...
Robin
"Allen Browne" <AllenBrowne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23ZQadVFyGHA.4392@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
You are saying that you eliminated the amazing Name AutoCorrupt feature
as suggested, performed a compact/repair, checked everything is okay, and
then as soon as you added a new field to your table, you instantly lost
one of your existing ones?
Something is *drastically* wrong here. Under rare circumstances, it is
possible for a field to go bad, but it is not possible for any normal
database to have a repeatable problem like that.
"Robin" <robin_irving@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:uGHisRFyGHA.1340@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks for the quick reply Allen.
Your suggestions don't seem to have made any difference - I think there
must be some more basic corruption creeping in.
The problem has occurred before - I thought I'd better check first
around the Web if it was a well known glitch before I asked on a
newsgroup - but apparently not...
Robin
"Allen Browne" <AllenBrowne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:u8IA70EyGHA.4392@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Never seen that. Something is wrong with the database.
You haven't just typed over the top of one of the fields, replacing it
with something else?
Try these basic repair steps.
1. Uncheck the boxes under:
Tools | Options | General | Name AutoCorrect
Explanation of why:
http://allenbrowne.com/bug-03.html
2. Compact the database to get rid of this junk:
Tools | Database Utilities | Compact/Repair
3. Close Access. Make a backup copy of the file. Decompile the database
by entering something like this at the command prompt while Access is
not running. It is all one line, and include the quotes:
"c:\Program Files\Microsoft office\office\msaccess.exe" /decompile
"c:\MyPath\MyDatabase.mdb"
4. Open Access (holding down the Shift key if you have any startup
code), and compact again.
"Robin" <robin_irving@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23RpkzoEyGHA.2208@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I've had this happen a couple of times (and have worked out a
workaround) but was wondering whether anyone can shed any light on it.
I'll edit the design of a table by adding a new field and when I go to
enter data in it ... it's not there... so I attempt to remake the
field and (if I use the same name) I'm told that a field of that name
already exists - but I can't see it.
When this hapens in a table my workaround involves adding yet another
field (called something like 'empty') and the previous one reappears
(but the field called 'empty' is invisible)
Has anyone seen this before? Any explanations?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Field 'disappears' from table ...
- From: Robin
- Re: Field 'disappears' from table ...
- From: Robin
- Re: Field 'disappears' from table ...
- From: Robin
- Re: Field 'disappears' from table ...
- References:
- Field 'disappears' from table ...
- From: Robin
- Re: Field 'disappears' from table ...
- From: Allen Browne
- Re: Field 'disappears' from table ...
- From: Robin
- Re: Field 'disappears' from table ...
- From: Allen Browne
- Re: Field 'disappears' from table ...
- From: Robin
- Field 'disappears' from table ...
- Prev by Date: Re: Field 'disappears' from table ...
- Next by Date: Re: Field 'disappears' from table ...
- Previous by thread: Re: Field 'disappears' from table ...
- Next by thread: Re: Field 'disappears' from table ...
- Index(es):