Re: Looking for best solution
- From: "Jeff Boyce" <JeffBoyce_IF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 04:47:39 -0700
If you are saying that there's a chance the 7 could each/all modify the same
record (and even if there's no chance), take a look at "replication" (check
in the replication newsgroup, too).
--
Good luck
Jeff Boyce
<Access MVP>
"Tonkle" <Tonkle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:0BEA573B-9470-4394-A1B5-3D232B604ADD@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Hello,
>
> I need to determine the best way to take a database in Access 2000 and
> enable 7 field operaters to update infomation in the field and then have
> their updates entered into the master database in the office.
>
> The database has a master table with customer data and each field operator
> would update relevant information in a secondary table linked to the
master.
> By allowing them to update in the field on their laptops they would only
need
> to do some type of syncing with the master database. This sync would
update
> the master database and then give them an updated copy of the master
table.
>
> They need to be able to view the master table information but only adjust
> the information in the secondary table. The master database table is
> adjusted and added to throught the day by the office staff.
>
> I am not sure the best course to take: FE/BE model in Access 2000,
> Import/Export, or multiple databases linked to the master database
>
> Thanks,
> tonkle
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Looking for best solution
- From: Tonkle
- Re: Looking for best solution
- References:
- Looking for best solution
- From: Tonkle
- Looking for best solution
- Prev by Date: Re: Should I Have Only 1 Table?
- Next by Date: upsizing to SQL.
- Previous by thread: Looking for best solution
- Next by thread: Re: Looking for best solution
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading