Re: Multiple users on a network.
From: Duane Hookom (duanehookom_at_NO_SPAMhotmail.com)
Date: 01/08/05
- Next message: Duane Hookom: "Re: How to stop opening of multiple instance of Access 2000 after"
- Previous message: Van T. Dinh: "Re: Logical question on primary keys..."
- In reply to: Newman: "Re: Multiple users on a network."
- Next in thread: Jeff Boyce: "Re: Multiple users on a network."
- Reply: Jeff Boyce: "Re: Multiple users on a network."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 00:35:23 -0600
Apparently you don't know how to behave in public.Continue on if you feel
the need to do so. Consider this my last post in this thead.
-- Duane Hookom MS Access MVP "Newman" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:17dc01c4f500$03fca2b0$a601280a@phx.gbl... > wow Duane, did you find any polyps up there in Rick? Id > say you were in far enough. What did he have to eat > yesterday? sheeesh.... You need to renew the > prescription for the reality pills. > > Thank you > > >>-----Original Message----- >>Thanks, Duane. >> >>I will admit that multiple posts, or posts for common > questions might annoy >>me a bit and I have been rather short at times, but my > intentions were in >>the right place. >> >>Have a good weekend. >> >>The Real Rick B >> >>"Duane Hookom" <duanehookom@NO_SPAMhotmail.com> wrote in > message >>news:uK7iCxO9EHA.3596@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... >>> Jason and Newman, >>> Those of us that attempt to provide support to the > news groups should be >>> able to expect and promote some basic etiquette. > Please read the >>information >>> at this page http://www.mvps.org/access/netiquette.htm. >>> >>> If you don't want to, don't understand, or can't > follow these simple >>> requests then I expect that some of those that might > provide the greatest >>> support for you will ignore you. Most of the instances > will cause someone >>to >>> give you a gentle nudge in the right direction. Rick > B's response was far >>> from critical or abusive. I didn't detect any offense > even though you both >>> seemed to have. >>> >>> If Jason didn't think it was a multi-post, all he had > to do was clarify. >>> There was no reason to make suggestions to Rick B. > about how he should >>spend >>> his time. Lighten-up guys. At least keep the postings > mature. >>> >>> I often create sample tables and test various > solutions prior to posting >>> answers to the news groups. Could you think about my > frustration if I did >>> this for one of your questions and then later found > the same question and >>a >>> similar reply in another news group? Most of us are > quite busy with work >>and >>> family and use our "spare" time to provide assistance. > None of us are >>> getting paid for posting. >>> >>> In this case, the questions might have been worded a > bit differently to >>> enhance their uniqueness. I didn't see the question in > the security ng. >>> >>> -- >>> Duane Hookom >>> MS Access MVP >>> >>> >>> "Newman" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote > in message >>> news:06f901c4f4e4$f15e33a0$a501280a@phx.gbl... >>> > Bravo Jason, my thoughts exactly... if a persons > time was >>> > THAT valuable, the person wouldnt even be here > answering >>> > questions, he'd be making a living, something at > least >>> > that would bring him benefit of time spent well. :-) >>> > Bravo! So to the users who dislike multiposts, if you >>> > dont like it...dont read it! >>> >>-----Original Message----- >>> >>Actually, the first question was more sepecific > because >>> > it was asking about >>> >>SECURITY. The second was asking about how to DEPLOY > the >>> > database itself. >>> >>Although they are very similar, they weren't the > same. >>> > First, thanks for >>> >>your help, second, if your times so precious, don't >>> > spend it policing the >>> >>user group by responding to questions that are > similar. >>> > Rewording questions >>> >>is a way of getting more responses, from different >>> > people. This is what user >>> >>groups are designed for. >>> >>"Rick B" wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> Jason: >>> >>> >>> >>> You just asked this question (but in more detail) > in >>> > the security group. >>> >>> You don't really want people wasting their time >>> > writing a response here if >>> >>> there is already a response there, do you? >>> >>> >>> >>> Please don't post duplicate messages in different >>> > groups. >>> >>> >>> >>> Rick B >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> "Jason" <Jason@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in >>> > message >>> >>> news:0AC10940-FD46-454A-958B- >>> > AA9D591ACF2B@microsoft.com... >>> >>> > What's the best way to deploy a database that > will >>> > be used by multiple >>> >>> users >>> >>> > simultaneously, with growth in mind. I'd prefer > to >>> > use the Access >>> >>> security >>> >>> > to control individuals rights. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>. >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>. >>
- Next message: Duane Hookom: "Re: How to stop opening of multiple instance of Access 2000 after"
- Previous message: Van T. Dinh: "Re: Logical question on primary keys..."
- In reply to: Newman: "Re: Multiple users on a network."
- Next in thread: Jeff Boyce: "Re: Multiple users on a network."
- Reply: Jeff Boyce: "Re: Multiple users on a network."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
