Re: Allow Zero Length String Property - 2000 vs 2003
From: Brendan Reynolds (brenreyn)
Date: 12/16/04
- Next message: Student4life: "RE: Switchboard error?"
- Previous message: Duane Hookom: "Re: Convert table data to a linked table"
- In reply to: Ash: "Allow Zero Length String Property - 2000 vs 2003"
- Next in thread: david epsom dot com dot au: "Re: Allow Zero Length String Property - 2000 vs 2003"
- Reply: david epsom dot com dot au: "Re: Allow Zero Length String Property - 2000 vs 2003"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 17:56:17 -0000
I can only assume that it was a misguided attempt to 'protect' inexperienced
users from having to deal with Null values. If so, it was of course doomed
to failure, as they will sooner or later have to deal with Null values in
numeric or date fields anyway.
Are you the same person who posted the 'Allow Zero Length String in MS
Access 2002 and 2003' post? If not, be sure to check out that thread if you
haven't already done so.
-- Brendan Reynolds (MVP) http://brenreyn.blogspot.com The spammers and script-kiddies have succeeded in making it impossible for me to use a real e-mail address in public newsgroups. E-mail replies to this post will be deleted without being read. Any e-mail claiming to be from brenreyn at indigo dot ie that is not digitally signed by me with a GlobalSign digital certificate is a forgery and should be deleted without being read. Follow-up questions should in general be posted to the newsgroup, but if you have a good reason to send me e-mail, you'll find a useable e-mail address at the URL above. "Ash" <Ash@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:2EDDB913-E7FA-4BA7-9CED-425292A6A7A9@microsoft.com... > Hello, > > I created a table using MS Access 2003 (Which uses Access 2000 format > database), the default value for the attribute, "Allow Zero Length String" > has been changed to Yes. > > Can anyone please verify, why it has been done? Is there any way to > change > this default. > > My two cents: For the past 6 years I am used to seeing the default for > "Allow Zero Length String" to No. Changing all of a sudden to Yes, broke > a > whole lot of things. It is extremely frustrating. Why the folks at > Microsoft do not get the concept of backward compatibility. Actually, if > you > look at every other relational database, Null value is what goes into a > column, when you try to insert a zero length string. With that in mind, > the > defaul of No for the attribute made sense. > > I would appreciate the comments. > > -- > Ash
- Next message: Student4life: "RE: Switchboard error?"
- Previous message: Duane Hookom: "Re: Convert table data to a linked table"
- In reply to: Ash: "Allow Zero Length String Property - 2000 vs 2003"
- Next in thread: david epsom dot com dot au: "Re: Allow Zero Length String Property - 2000 vs 2003"
- Reply: david epsom dot com dot au: "Re: Allow Zero Length String Property - 2000 vs 2003"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading