Re: Referential Integrity on relationship with Multiple fields
From: Allen Browne (AllenBrowne_at_SeeSig.Invalid)
Date: 03/18/04
- Next message: Joe Sutphin: "Re: Access Date/Time"
- Previous message: John Vinson: "Re: Firstname Lastname - Lastname, Firstname"
- In reply to: Peter Johal: "Re: Referential Integrity on relationship with Multiple fields"
- Next in thread: Peter Johal: "Re: Referential Integrity on relationship with Multiple fields"
- Reply: Peter Johal: "Re: Referential Integrity on relationship with Multiple fields"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 01:56:15 +0800
Just tested that in 2 steps, and no problem here.
Deleted my relation.
Added an entry to Table1 just to be sure.
Created the 2-field relation without RI.
Re-opened the Relationships window, double-clicked the relation, and checked
the RI box.
Wonder what's different?
(Will check back tomorrow: it's 2am here.)
-- Allen Browne - Microsoft MVP. Perth, Western Australia. Tips for Access users - http://allenbrowne.com/tips.html Reply to group, rather than allenbrowne at mvps dot org. "Peter Johal" <pjohal02@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:77E0E8BC-9B85-4A0F-AB3E-72132A3141CB@microsoft.com... > > I'm using the same jet engine. And tried to create the relation on an access 97 database, but again I got the same result. > > The relationship I'm trying to create is exactly as you discribe it. But I want to emphasize that I am able to create the relationship. I am just unable to turn on the option to enforce referential integrity. I do it in two steps: first I create the relationship and save. Then I try to turn on referential integrity and I get the error message. > > Peter > > ----- Allen Browne wrote: ----- > > Yes: created in A2003. > Just tested a pair of 30-char fields. > > Don't know if it makes a difference, but I am using Jet 4 SP8, i.e. > msjet40.dll is version 4.0.8015. > > You are creating the relation on the combination of the 2 fields? i.e. in > the Edit relations dialog, you have: > Table/Query Related Table/Query > Table1 Table2 > F1 F1 > F2 F2 > where Table1 is the one that has F1 + F2 as primary key. > > > "Peter Johal" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:7C5FD2B1-FAA8-421C-A9C9-C521E01DFDBB@microsoft.com... > >> I have two text fields length 30 in both tables. Data type and size match. > And there are no hidden indexes, I used your count statement: I a count of > 1. > >> I created two dummy tables from scratch and tried to enforce referential > integrety on again on a relationship with two fields, but again with the > same result. > >> Then I changed the datatype on the first field on both tables to > autonumber/ numeric. But again I got the same result. > >> Are you using access 2003? > >> Peter > >> ----- Allen Browne wrote: ----- > >> Just tested here, Peter, and the relationship was created fine. > > The example I tested used a Number (Long) + Text (20-char) in both > tables. > >> Make sure your field pair match on data type and size in both tables. > > Remove any spurious indexes on the table, including any hidden > indexes. > > You may need to test this programmatically: > > ? CurrentDb().TableDefs("YourPrimaryTable").Indexes.Count > >> "Peter Johal" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > > news:973C56DA-A7FB-4B8A-8418-6FE7B50F4CCA@microsoft.com... > >> I cannot turn on referential integrity on a relationship > (parent-child) > > with two field. Access gives the error message (translated from > dutch): > >>> No unique index has been found on field of primary table that > is > > references. (Error 3609) > >>> However, the primairy key of the primary table consist of > precisely the > > two field in the relationship. So there is a unique index on those > two > > fields. > >>> I'm using access 2003. Is this an error or a limition of access? > What can > > I do? > >>> Peter
- Next message: Joe Sutphin: "Re: Access Date/Time"
- Previous message: John Vinson: "Re: Firstname Lastname - Lastname, Firstname"
- In reply to: Peter Johal: "Re: Referential Integrity on relationship with Multiple fields"
- Next in thread: Peter Johal: "Re: Referential Integrity on relationship with Multiple fields"
- Reply: Peter Johal: "Re: Referential Integrity on relationship with Multiple fields"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|