Re: Exceeds maximum index number
From: RSGinCA (rsginca_at_aol.com.NO.Spam)
Date: 03/03/04
- Next message: John Vinson: "Re: Live chats every Tuesday and Thursday"
- Previous message: Todd: "Re: Exceeds maximum index number"
- In reply to: Todd: "Re: Exceeds maximum index number"
- Next in thread: Todd: "Re: Exceeds maximum index number"
- Reply: Todd: "Re: Exceeds maximum index number"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 03 Mar 2004 04:45:28 GMT
Ok...
Here's a note about Access 97:
"In Microsoft Access 95 and Access 97, a single table cannot have more than 32
indexes and direct relationships combined."
See:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/archive/default.asp?url=/archive/en-us/dnaracces
sdev/html/odc_access97conversionissues.asp
This specifically refers to Access 95 and 97 BUT I think it was written in 1997
and was specifically talking about conversion from an EARLIER version of
Access. So the fact that it was specifically referring to 95 and 97 doesn't
mean that it doesn't apply to Access 2003.
I do know that the specs for Access 2003 do say that 32 indexes are allowed in
a table and that it makes no mention of relationships, but who knows... If I
had the time I'd try it out to see if a lot of relationships affect it. From
your experience I'd be almost willing to bet it does.
Another thing: I was looking around, and I think I saw someplace that if you
specify "enforce referential integrity" for a relationship that a index will be
build for BOTH sides of a relationship. Do you have that specified for your
relationships? (Go to the relationship window... right click on the
relationship line... click on 'edit relationship'. There's a checkbox for
"Enforse Referential Integrity"... Is that checked?)
Rick
>Subject: Re: Exceeds maximum index number
>From: "=?Utf-8?B?VG9kZA==?=" anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com
>Date: 3/2/2004 8:01 PM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: <188D4444-D3DE-4E24-B658-8A68E3C0AD52@microsoft.com>
>
>Access 2003
- Next message: John Vinson: "Re: Live chats every Tuesday and Thursday"
- Previous message: Todd: "Re: Exceeds maximum index number"
- In reply to: Todd: "Re: Exceeds maximum index number"
- Next in thread: Todd: "Re: Exceeds maximum index number"
- Reply: Todd: "Re: Exceeds maximum index number"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|