Re: Word 2007 Missing User Level Securitty - ARRRGGGGHHHH What were they thinking?
- From: "Steve House" <sjhouse at hotmail dot com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 18:45:00 -0400
"Rick Brandt" <rickbrandt2@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:SI8Qj.9824$V14.4058@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
....in panic mode
Access ULS security was never very secure and the prevailing theory is that since a file based system can never be made secure that there was no point continuing the charade. I assume the lawyers had a hand in the decision.
You are aware that there are utilities one can find on the internet that will defeat ULS aren't you? They have been around for several years now.
--
Rick Brandt, Microsoft Access MVP
Email (as appropriate) to...
RBrandt at Hunter dot com
Thanks - Yep, I'm aware that it's not foolproof but many of my clients don't need to protect their data so much from hackers as they need to protect it from snoopy file clerks and sales-droids who are not Access literate. Oh well, the good Lord giveth and taketh away <grin>.
--
Steve House [Project MVP]
MS Project Trainer & Consultant
Visit http://project.mvps.org/faqs.htm for the FAQs
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: How to go from 2 secure MDB's with 1 workgroup to 2 workgroups
- Next by Date: Re: ACCESS 2007 Missing User Level Securitty - ARRRGGGGHHHH What were they thinking?
- Previous by thread: Re: Word 2007 Missing User Level Securitty - ARRRGGGGHHHH What were they thinking?
- Next by thread: Re: ACCESS 2007 Missing User Level Securitty - ARRRGGGGHHHH What were they thinking?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|