Re: Network Shortcut Problems
- From: "Tony Toews [MVP]" <ttoews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 12:25:06 -0600
"Chris Mills" <phad_nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks for your response. I realize that there are structural problems with
the setup (no front end / back end split), but that's just how it has to be
to suit our application.
A non-split database will "work" networked with several users, so that is not
your direct problem here.
(I once ran 4 users networked in a similar way for months, and it seemed OK)
Access 97 was much more stable in this regard. I still had some
corruptions though.
(Don't ask me how reliability of the OS/Network works! I thought, corrupted
file reads were detected by the likes of parity or better and re-sent. At the
OS level. Nevertheless, theory being just an amusement, the "macroscopic"
results in Access seem to be universal - corruption happens!)
I think it's more a matter of the network component OS keeps retrying
to send the data but finally gives up. And Access times out pretty
quickly too. And if only some packets get through then Jet really
has a tough time with things.
Tony
--
Tony Toews, Microsoft Access MVP
Please respond only in the newsgroups so that others can
read the entire thread of messages.
Microsoft Access Links, Hints, Tips & Accounting Systems at
http://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm
Tony's Microsoft Access Blog - http://msmvps.com/blogs/access/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Network Shortcut Problems
- From: David W. Fenton
- Re: Network Shortcut Problems
- References:
- Re: Network Shortcut Problems
- From: Joan Wild
- Re: Network Shortcut Problems
- From: Chris Mills
- Re: Network Shortcut Problems
- Prev by Date: Re: Access2003 users have admin rights, change to mobile user righ
- Next by Date: Data in tables stored on Hard Drive
- Previous by thread: Re: Network Shortcut Problems
- Next by thread: Re: Network Shortcut Problems
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|