Re: Object permissions
- From: "'69 Camaro" <ForwardZERO_SPAM.To.69Camaro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 12:43:59 -0800
Hi, Joan.
You can, and I have, made a group the owner of an object.
Doh! Thanks for the correction. I could have sworn I've done the same thing as
Scott and received the same error message because I accidentally grabbed the
group name, not the user name when I assigned the new owner. I can see that
there's no such problem when I try it now.
Thanks.
Gunny
See http://www.QBuilt.com for all your database needs.
See http://www.Access.QBuilt.com for Microsoft Access tips and tutorials.
http://www.Access.QBuilt.com/html/expert_contributors2.html for contact info.
"Joan Wild" <jwild@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:upJGqprIHHA.5104@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
'69 Camaro wrote:
So I tried to change the object's owner to the group "Admins". . .
Am I missing something here?
Yes. You may assign one -- and only one -- user as the new owner of
the object. A group is not a user. A group contains zero to many
users as members, so a group is related conceptually to users, but a
group can't substitute for a user as the "owner."
You can, and I have, made a group the owner of an object. Doesn't matter in
Scott's case, but I thought I'd point out that this can be done.
--
Joan Wild
Microsoft Access MVP
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Object permissions
- From: Scott
- Re: Object permissions
- References:
- Re: Object permissions
- From: Joan Wild
- Re: Object permissions
- Prev by Date: Re: New to Access Security
- Next by Date: user and group permissions on basis of data
- Previous by thread: Re: Object permissions
- Next by thread: Re: Object permissions
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|