Re: Access 2000 to 2002 - What do I watch for?
- From: <david@epsomdotcomdotau>
- Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 08:44:15 +1100
Since 2002 had effectively no new bugs or features, it is
easy to imagine that the only reason there was a new 'version'
was because MS Office was coming out in a new version.
Some of us who had been forced by incompetent management
to use Access 2000, felt a little bitter about being cut off
from what was effectively the next service pack for Access 2000.
(david)
<PGPianta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1139794146.011039.260340@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,
I'm being forced by a business software review to upgrade users with
Access 2000 to Access 2002. The database they use has been developed in
2000 and I have limited time to perform testing in the 2002
environment. Does anyone know of a 'checklist' of things to look out
for when this 2000-2002 change occurs. I figure if I at least get my
head around potential issues prior to the change, I'll be better
prepared to respond if we have any problems.
.
- References:
- Access 2000 to 2002 - What do I watch for?
- From: PGPianta
- Access 2000 to 2002 - What do I watch for?
- Prev by Date: Re: /RO not working with linked tables
- Next by Date: mdw security file
- Previous by thread: Re: Access 2000 to 2002 - What do I watch for?
- Next by thread: Re: database protection
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
