Re: Re: I have been asked to leave the company for having spotted serious security breaches

Tech-Archive recommends: Fix windows errors by optimizing your registry

From: Phillip Windell (_at_.)
Date: 02/04/05 

Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 09:11:02 -0600

"Agent_C" <Agent-C-hates-spam@nyc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:3fh501puhffug2l11f3ega1ain5as924rk@4ax.com...
> >For me, I can always get another job because at least I tried to improve
the
> >situation, for closed minds like the ones I have had to report to, the
only
> >answer is to change your identity and pray that it never surfaces again.
>
> You know; you're far too fascinated with yourself for your own good.

I don't see that being the case at all. I have followed this from the first
post. I can see why the closed minded people fired him because that is what
closed minded people do when they feel threatened. I really don't see that
much wrong with the process that "Curious George" went through over all,
other than maybe he could have backed off a little sooner because you can't
stop fools from being fools.

Either way the job was inevitably over whether by them releasing him or by
leaving on his own to get out of the trap he was in since he would have got
the blame for the network being hacked afterwards, in spite of the fact that
he opposed it to begin with. Him saying "I told you so" may have got him off
the hook with normal people, but not with closed minded fools because such
people always blame others for their problems,..and he would have been the
target.

I would not have fired him,...I would have either given the project to him,
then if it failed it would rest on him,..or if I decided against him I would
have just left him to "get over it". 

-- 
Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
www.wandtv.com

Relevant Pages